Quote from: Pandu Geddon on Today at 02:02:53 PM

Quote from: shogun47 on Today at 01:52:52 PM

But De Gea was a risk factor sometimes. He has made mistakes too often and it was the type of mistakes that just can't happen. Every time I saw a defender passing the ball back to him, I kept my breath and thought ok, this is going to be the next fuck up by him.

But Onana is a good choice although I think that the defense in general hasn't been doing very well. I think when you have some weak players, it also makes everyone else less confident.

The decision has been taken by the club. United replaced De Gea with Onana. whether the performance looks good or not for United. but we can see that De Gea is old and must be replaced for United who will play a match with a tighter level of competition. Onana was brought in to be a solution. Ten Hag has a job to do to make United's defense strong.
I personally think the decision to bring in Onana was quite right. Even though he has now conceded 7 times, there is more important work for Ten Hag to complete. not in their goalkeeper. some players who make mistakes too often may have to be removed from the squad.

De Gea is a good enough goalkeeper I know that. He is experienced. But Onana is not a bad goalkeeper. And the decision to add Onana was the right one. Onana may not be as experienced as De Gea. Even so, Onana's performance is not worse than De Gea's. Manchester United conceded 7 goals in 4 matches. Onana is not the only one to blame for this. Manchester United have tactical weaknesses. At the same time, the weakness of their defense has been very well visible in every match. Ten Hag should deal with Manchester United's defence. If the defense is not strong, this team cannot stay on top of the points table.