1. Your open-source software with its default settings working with the default coordinator isn't privacy software.
The funny part is that their legal document describes the terms of use in a way that you I assume there is one coordinator. It's as if there is no other coordinator, or desire to run a separate coordinator. The software is released under the MIT license, but there is a very strict list of terms you need to agree on to use it. And I still haven't got anything in response to that. (I genuinely don't know what are the legal approach for a person who isn't affiliated with Wasabi, but want to run their own instance of Wasabi backend)
You have no way to know that. You don't know if that is true. You are a trustless entity that relies on a blackbox to tell you what is acceptable and what is not with no way of verifying the accuracy of the information.
This is as simple as that. I really don't know why we've extended this discussion so far. They're like presenting themselves as transparent, but then pay someone to tell them who they
believe is a criminal with no evidence? And also, how valuable can this information be for an entity that protects privacy? I just don't get it.