This wallet relies on a centralized service by default which blacklists certain coins if they come from illicit activities according to chain analysis.
This is wrong, you do not rely on a centralized service that can blacklist your coins.
This wallet makes it harder to spy on your balance using coinjoin, however with default settings, coordinator will use coinjoin fees to fund chain analysis. You should still take care to use a new Bitcoin address each time you request payment.
This section is about Wasabi implementing BIP32, coinjoin functionality isn't mentioned in this section. What makes you think the relevant information to educate users who want to use the coinjoin function is the expense side of the coinjoin coordinator company's balance sheet? Do you think that all wallets that do not have coinjoin functionality at all should have their privacy downgraded since you think the concept of not using coinjoins is something the user should be warned about?