Quote from: franky1 on September 14, 2023, 11:23:33 PM

sounds like paypal owned funds stored in paxos, where paypal wanted to withdraw small amount from paxos, but paxos(the withdrawal service) sent out the small withdrawal amount but using a large utxo without using a change address for remaining unspent output balance

That's actually what happened and as I was expecting, Paxos said: This only impacted Paxos corporate operations, Paxos clients and end users have not been affected and all customer funds are safe.^[source]
They can't take care of their funds but they can take care of our funds, this sounds so funny.

By the way, if I were F2Pool owner, I wouldn't refund transaction fees to Paxos. If it was a random guy, okay, I would be kind but financial institutes like PayPal and its partner Paxos, they deserve to pay for their mistakes. There is absolutely no reason for F2Pool to refund, who is here to determine whether that fee was a mistake or not? The fact is, you are the one who chooses to pay fees. I can make a transaction with $1000 fee and then cry and ask for refund, I can make a transaction with $10 fee and do the same. Also, the result of Twitter vote was Distribute it to miners.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 07:52:57 AM

Quote from: Synchronice on September 14, 2023, 07:02:29 PM

Personally, I exclude that it was done for laundering.

The transaction was broadcast publicly. It absolutely was not done for money laundering purposes.

Yes, that's what I am saying. It wasn't done for money laundering purpose because not only it was broadcasted publicly, absolutely every person would understand that such a huge mining fees would attract everyone's attention and would make the transaction one of the most known one, blockchain is a public book of transactions after all.