Quote from: rendravolt on Today at 06:42:54 AM

It's true that we know that currently Chelsea doesn't have a creative midfielder like KDB or Odegaard who can always supply the ball to his teammates to score goals, but on the other hand, their attack line doesn't have anyone who can do that finishing. If you ask me where Mudryk is placed, I will put him on the bench until the season ends then sell him to another club. Everyone knows this player is very useless and Chelsea has certainly lost a lot because of this worst purchase. I saw that he had failed as a young player and was now nothing more than an amateur football player. It's a shame that Chelsea spent a lot of money on Mudryk last winter.

And I think it's still fortunate that Raheem Sterling is at Chelsea because he is still the only player who plays an important role in attacking the opponent's defense. Sterling is able to read opponents' weaknesses, so instead of using Mudryk as a striker who is always unable to complete ball passes, it is better to have him on the bench as you said. Because without Mudryk I will be optimistic that Chelsea can be more effective.

Quote from: Velvet78 on Today at 08:47:26 AM

It is nice to hear about Odegaard's being keen on extending his contract with Arsenal already now. Because he is one of the most valuable players for Arsenal so they wouldn't like to lose him early. Extending with him would prevent some other teams from trying to allure the player to themselves as well.

I am happy to hear this news because after all, Odegaard is still a player that Arsenal needs to continue to improve its consistency. Odegaard presence is quite important, plus Arteta entrusted him with the captain's armband and it shows Arsenal's leadership on the field when playing relies heavily on the captain's instructions.