Quote from: Fakhrulenclix on Today at 04:43:41 AM

Quote from: Mame89 on September 19, 2023, 06:38:58 PM

Quote from: Sexylizzy2813 on September 10, 2023, 02:45:34 AM

Is just that without the poor the rich can't completely achieve their goal, because if you look at it this way like you said there would be massive job creation. With that you don't expect the rich after buying shares they should still be the ones to engage in both the laboring department, no. That's why I said without the poor the rich finds it hard to get to their goal.

Yes, that's right, both of them are actually tied to each other to achieve their goals. As you have said, they need each other even to achieve their respective goals. Because without complementing each other, the goals they want will be difficult to achieve. However, rich people and poor people have the same thing in common, namely that they both have big egos, because they both feel that their rights must come first, and in the end their faces are the same.

So back to the OP's thread, if I could choose who I should help first, I would choose to prioritize helping the poor. because I believe rich people will remain rich even without help, they will remain financially safe. This is very different from poor people, if they are not helped then their difficulties will increase. Whether we admit it or not, in many countries the number of poor people is definitely the largest. It could be said that there are more poor people than rich people. So by helping poor people, life in the country will also be safer and more stable because in some countries crime has increased due to the large number of poor people.

All humans need each other, in fact, no one can do it alone, between poor people and rich people there is a continuity of mutual assistance and it cannot be separated.
And regarding which one will be helped first, of course everyone will help solve problems for the people who need it, for rich people who have excess finances they can get out of problems by using the financial strength they have, while poor people can't, so it's clear that poor people are given priority.

The problem here is that the OP's question is about solving the problem, not who we choose to support. The rich and the poor are inextricably linked and the two are almost inseparable if they want to survive. And the problem of the poor is largely economic and to be able to solve that requires rich people, because the rich are the ones who are building businesses and creating jobs. From there, it helps the poor solve the problems of the poor. So if we choose to solve problems, we only need to solve the rich people's problems and the poor people's problems will also be solved.
Just as the government wants to improve people's lives, what they need to do is promote businesses to expand production, create more jobs and the poor will be helped through that.