Quote from: joker_josue on September 21, 2023, 06:24:00 PM

I hope you like the file!
It is still in the development phase, and therefore some glitches may occur. If you find it, I would appreciate it if you let me know.

If you have ideas, feel free. Wink

It's much more functional than my draft version. I think we should just work to simplify if possible, before introducing (or thinking of) new functionality. I like it personally, great job!

Quote from: execijutiere on September 21, 2023, 07:47:11 PM

Will double chance, boths score or TG over/under options be added to this in the future or will we just continue to play the "stake" points given to the results?

It's definitely a possibility. There are pros and cons:

Pros

Much more variety of markets
More diverse results and tactics

Cons

Each additional market creates a layer of manual verification, multiplied by # of players, increasing the risk of error
typical over/under, BTTS odds have a much narrower odds range than 1x2, so points difference would be very small

Quote from: CLS63 on September 21, 2023, 11:11:24 PM

Maybe we could see a Pot B weighted pool next season. When we come back to the topic of taking risks I'm feeling myself like a fool because of closing the first week by 0 points.

Many, many seasons ago I played on indie fantasy that resembled classic FPL, but included weighted bonus, which was inverse to the cost of the player. e.g. Haaland scoring a goal is worth only the basic points, while Solanke scoring a goal is worth basic point with a higher multiplier.

I imagine a fairer prediction system that mixes Superbru classic system of base points for scores, but with a weighted multiplier based on likelihood of the predicted score. And you can even add layers of risk (pick a score, pick a scorer, pick an assist, or pick the route to the outcome).

I'm a huge fan of rewarding risk in all kinds of games, sportsbetting or even just gaming in general =)

Quote from: 1miau on September 21, 2023, 11:21:35 PM

So, my conclusion is simple: for getting a Top 20% result, I'm anticipating, a participant may need around at least x1.4 per round to get a Top 20% position and claim a prize spot.
Not sure about general numbers since like you've said, lots of favorites won and therefore, many people made good points by backing favorites but for our next round, numbers might change in case of upsets.

You think like I do. Guaranteeing to be in top 10 is not good enough -- you'll likely fall to 15th with nothing. I think it's wise to aim for big points in games you're confident in (BVB was that risk for me) and then hedging with others. It worked for vd309 for sure, now he has to repeat is. cryptofrka also won big. Generally non-sustainable over 40 games but we have only 10 Matchdays in UCL so you need to aim for variance, not consistency. Is how I feel!

Quote from: slaman29 on Today at 08:17:01 AM

Yes, great work joker and buway, I saw all the scores but forgot to give you guys credit for doing all of this. I hope Rollbit is paying you guys well lol

joker_josue all credit for sheet, my version will forever not be shown haha. Hhampuz credit for helping negotiate the deal with Rollbit.com

I hope it's not cliché to say we actually enjoy doing this -- it's just fun to see the forum revolve around many engaging topics.