Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 01:30:22 PM

Quote from: BetKing.io on Today at 12:57:53 PM

If I thought there was a chance old players would play and I had the time I would open it to players again and any profit the site made would just go to investor refunds.

If that was the case I would close the site the moment the last token was refunded.

This is a defeatist attitude one would not expect from you. What has changed for you to hold this view?

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 01:30:22 PM

Quote from: BetKing.io on Today at 12:57:53 PM

I have no long term goal with the website or brand and have no interest in trying to make a profit with it.

The question arises: why have you given up on it? (I am not saying you should or should not give up on betking because my perspective as a non-token holder would depend purely on what you claim your intention is).

It would be a waste of time since you destroyed the reputation of BetKing on this forum with false scam accusations and very good SEO techniques Wink

.

The competition is too big now too. It was over 6 years ago that BetKing was on top. It's not possible to compete with sites like Stake who have billions of $ for marketing.
It would be an uphill losing battle at every step.
I also have no desire to operate a casino any more. That is not an easy job to do with the amount of abuse you receive as any operator here would be able to confirm.

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 01:30:22 PM

If it is purely to allow those holding BKB/BKT then it has to be funded from somewhere.

There is confusion because there is a contradiction. On one hand you say you have no interest in making a profit from the website and also you would close it after the last token was refunded yet you said it is privately funded. Can you elaborate because if $2 million worth of tokens were outstanding and only $44,000 was recently refunded (or brought back in the sale), how do you intend to make all token holders whole again? Do you have $2 million worth of investment to pay all those funds back if token holders try to sell them back to you?

It would be privately funded if I chose to open again. Not looking for new investors or any public bankroll model. I can get the funding no problem for bankroll. But that wouldn't guarantee the site being profitable due the issues mentioned above.

My time is best spent elsewhere where I can actually make money to refund investors instead of struggling with a brand damaged site. I spent too long trying that.

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 01:30:22 PM

Can you elaborate because if $2 million worth of tokens were outstanding and only $44,000 was recently refunded (or brought back in the sale), how do you intend to make all token holders whole again? Do you have $2 million worth of investment to pay all those funds back if token holders try to sell them back to you?

Of course I don't have $2mm to buy them right now, if I did or did have at any point in the past 4 years I would have already.
This is funds I am paying out of my own pocket from earnings elsewhere.

Keep in mind I don't need to do that, I have no legal obligation to do so, no investors were scammed. A lot of investors already made profit. Anyone who is refunded would actually make a profit due to the token price and ICO discounts. There's no other site operator who did an ICO that would do what I am doing.