Maybe this discussion started the matter, but icopress implemented a new rule when we talked about switching from campaign to campaign. It is clear what is to be achieved in this way, but I am not sure about the sustainability of this rule.
To me, this seems wrong in several ways, and I am not sure of the final motive for introducing such a rule. What comes to my mind is certainly not related to improving the quality of the campaign. However, the manager writes the rules of his campaign.
However, I am interested in the application of this rule, how the payment will be made, in case the participant refuses, and what will be the penalty. Red tag for changing the signature? And will it be applicable to all members, without exception, regardless of rank, status, influence...
Please note that by applying to this campaign you agree that if you are accepted, for any reason you want to leave the campaign in favor of a competitor's campaign, then you will have to pay compensation (the same amount that you received during the first week of your participation). This does not apply if you decide to switch to another campaign that is not advertising the mixer, or if you switch to a campaign that I manage.