Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:12:50 PM

Maybe this discussion started the matter, but icopress implemented a new rule when we talked about switching from campaign to campaign. It is clear what is to be achieved in this way, but I am not sure about the sustainability of this rule.
To me, this seems wrong in several ways, and I am not sure of the final motive for introducing such a rule. What comes to my mind is certainly not related to improving the quality of the campaign. However, the manager writes the rules of his campaign.

However, I am interested in the application of this rule, how the payment will be made, in case the participant refuses, and what will be the penalty. Red tag for changing the signature? And will it be applicable to all members, without exception, regardless of rank, status, influence...

Quote from: icopress on September 27, 2023, 07:40:50 AM

Please note that by applying to this campaign you agree that if you are accepted, for any reason you want to leave the campaign in favor of a competitor's campaign, then you will have to pay compensation (the same amount that you received during the first week of your participation). This does not apply if you decide to switch to another campaign that is not advertising the mixer, or if you switch to a campaign that I manage.

Signature campaign rules do really have those kind of changes and this is where it comes from those managers who do have the right to apply such conditions on which neither it could or could not affect the signature campaign or not. I have read up those terms about once you do get hired on a certain signature manage by him and on the time that you do make out some switch with some competitor
or other company then you are really that obliged on paying up those the amount that you had get from sig payment which i do see that it is really just that too much?
On this way then for sure people wouldnt really be that easily trying to switch up campaigns, if icopress did make out such rule just to avoid such condition or scenario then
its not a bad idea but a little bit too tight since you wont really be giving those participants some options.

Speaking about loyalty then this is something that have a lesser concern or not really that something that could imply among on the participants.They would always
be loving on spotting those campaigns which does pay more or better.