Quote from: pawel7777 on October 03, 2023, 09:54:15 PM

Good question. I remember at the beginning there was a lot of media coverage labeling him as Doctor, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if that turned out a lie too, or even if the title is real, he probably cheated to earn it.

As I mentioned above, his doctoral thesis was mostly plagiarized: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5468951.msg62938501#msg62938501

Quote from: Kakmakr on Today at 05:28:17 AM

Nope, simply signing into his forum account is not enough verification that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. I think Satoshi's account was accessed before, so it is compromised already. (Hackers might also find ways to access his account)

The account is locked, so no one can log in to it unless theymos manually unlocks it (or they hack the forum).

Quote from: Kakmakr on Today at 05:28:17 AM

The person or group who can sign an address that was known to be one of Satoshi's early addresses, will have the key to the title of being the real Satoshi...

Disagree. Signing a message from an early Satoshi-linked private key is necessary but not sufficient to prove you are Satoshi. That is to say, anyone who can't sign a message (such as CSW) can be ignored, but even if someone can sign a message it does not prove they are Satoshi. Signing a message would be enough to start a wider discussion and examination of the individual in question to see if they have the same knowledge, ability, ethics, etc., as Satoshi did (which CSW has none of).