Quote from: Yamane_Keto on Today at 12:17:34 PM

making your transaction resemble coinjoin (which is not a good thing, especially for those looking to hide their identity from their friends without using mixing services)

Why is that a bad thing?

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 12:23:48 PM

That's called "remixing", those 262 inputs and 294 outputs gained even more privacy by participating in multiple coinjoin transactions.

But, isn't remixing supposed to not merge inputs and outputs? If I am known to own 10 / 100 inputs of a coinjoin, and after the coinjoin, I use these coinjoined inputs for the next round, essentially merging the outputs into one, then you can make out the owner.

This Sparrow coinjoin[1], on the other hand, while there are remixes, you cannot tell who's who, because there are no input and output collaborations.

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 12:23:48 PM

You are wrong, a mixer is a trusted third party, they do not provide you privacy.

Disprove my claim by de-anonymizing this 0.001 BTC Mixtum deposit: https://mempool.space/tx/a2415334ad8b4f5d6e20175772f00a216cc889e8d5e0c972ec5ac216f18b0f06. If you can't, then I have successfully made myself untraceable to you, and therefore gained some privacy.

[1] https://kycp.org/#/0db15af0cad74e54f5dcbdd6809806ec2b25f20642ac5e9f1e513198240264c1