Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 07:21:27 PM

Plan A - shilling Wasabi successfully - didn't work.
Time for plan B: Switch the subject, or even better-- go completely off-topic! Cheesy

I'm going to stop derailing this thread further. Let's not turn it into a fifty-page long shitposting Wasabi tribute.

I'm just wondering why you aren't capable of admitting your claims have been proven wrong over and over and over. Let's review all the false statements you made-

FALSE STATEMENT 1: "Wasabi Coinjoins use flawed software"

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on October 11, 2023, 09:56:55 PM

Yeah, guys. You better off use flawed software that merges outputs together and funds the operation of chain analysis. What a sham.

Then you found out that inputs are consolidated privately in WabiSabi coinjoins:

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 01:14:34 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 01:04:16 PM

But, isn't remixing supposed to not merge inputs and outputs? If I am known to own 10 / 100 inputs of a coinjoin, and after the coinjoin, I use these coinjoined inputs for the next round, essentially merging the outputs into one, then you can make out the owner.

This is wrong. With WabiSabi, it isn't known how many inputs of a coinjoin you control. Since input consolidation is private, you could own 1 input, or your could own 10 inputs, there's no way to tell.

...and yet you continue to try to deceive everyone to convince them this is hurting the privacy of coinjoin participants:

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 02:37:57 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 02:10:27 PM

So, you do agree with me that input/output collaboration in coinjoin worsens its anonymity set?

No, it's the opposite: Having participants who remix before or after your coinjoin increases your anonymity set.

FALSE STATEMENT #2: "It is trivial to de-anonymize Coinbase outputs."

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 01:46:30 PM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 01:14:34 PM

If you deposited to Coinbase you would have gained the same privacy from me, you trusting someone else with that information is not a solution.

No, I wouldn't, because it is trivial to de-anonymize Coinbase outputs.

You were found to be bluffing about it being trivial to deanonymize Coinbase outputs because you are trying to convince people to give up their transaction data to your mixing site instead:

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 02:10:27 PM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 01:55:42 PM

How could I know which Coinbase address you withdrew from based on which Coinbase address you deposited to? If this tracking is trivial like you claim, I would love to know how it's performed.

You either address a company like Chainalysis or you find them leaked in some darknet website. I don't know the precise procedure, but I can guess it is trivial if you have the time and money.

FALSE STATEMENT #3: "Everyone except the Wasabi team knows you shouldn't reuse addresses"

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 02:10:27 PM

Everybody knows that except from Wasabi team apparently,

This was proven wrong by the Samourai team reusing their addresses to collect coinjoin fees from Whirlpool users:

Quote from: Kruw on October 01, 2023, 06:46:54 PM

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on June 17, 2023, 01:04:22 PM

Now show me a Samourai address reuse since they implemented the fixes you linked to, and I'll be happy to tell everyone to swap to JoinMarket instead.

o_e_l_e_o, here's some more Samourai address reuse I discovered since the last two Samourai address reuse bugs - https://kycp.org/#/075224a5f39388188daea9ab97cbe507bf807ef162221d2d3e5890a6755e1374