Quote from: MCUKing on October 09, 2023, 08:04:55 AM

First of all the 1-year hold and invest can't be considered a long-term investment it may fall into the semi-mid-term investment. Let me clarify but in the Bitcoin, a cycle lasts 4 years and in the cycle, the time span is not at all specific with any zone as any zone may last 2 years+ or any zone may last in a few months. booking profit on ATH cant be a long-term holding as a long-term.

You have got a valid point, I honestly, did now know the terms, like semi mid term etc. I searched it on AI and asked about it and it says, mid-term investment is less than 3 years and long-term is longer than 5 years. I don't know if this information is accurate, but I am aware of the types of trading and also know how long a trader holds on his/her trades, and if that limit crosses I start to call it to hold. And that's a maximum of 1 year.

But I think I should check on it more because I need more confirmation to start accepting new knowledge because I was getting the wrong idea till now just by accepting the statements others made on the time period of trading and holding.

Quote from: MCUKing on October 09, 2023, 08:04:55 AM

Thanks for the appreciation pretty disappointed by the response on the thread as everyone seems to be discussing the DCA DCA & DCA nobody considering the discussion of the Zone specific strategies which were mentioned to be discussed as after this whole study before posting and in my post as well I did mention that DCA can be an allrounder but it is not at all efficient if it is justified that was used to be the purpose of this topic. Everyone posted hurry I think except for a few ones (3 to 4) that they considered a redundant or typical topic. There were a few concerns which are not clarified. I was expecting a full-on debate on different strategies to obtain useful insights from seniors.

That it I will consider other replies in the next post.

Let's see what impact it brings in the new replies after changing the Subject title.

It's not your fault, sometimes it happens here, I mean I also made this mistake once, when I read the topic and a few lines of the post and interpreted it wrong and made a reply that was totally off-topic, but I think DCA talks are somehow relevant to your topic, I did not read all of the replies one by one made on this topic.

But, If you say so, then I think I can agree with you on it.

And talking about the irrelevancy of the commentators, I think your topic is a broad one, I mean, it would be wise if you would talk about each of the zones in different topics, like a version or series. That would be wise and try to remain more relevant in your individual topics because that's how you will get relevant replies on your topics. Otherwise, members are really not in a very rush but except a few, and all they do is notice some mistake or correction, or if they have any idea about something that you have written in the post, they share those ideas and nothing else.