Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 04:47:10 PM

Quote from: Mixero on Today at 04:16:15 PM

Matching input and output amounts becomes challenging due to the fees incurred post-transfer, which ensures that the output amount differs from the input amount. Moreover, even before attempting to correlate these amounts, one would have to navigate through the complexities of the Monero network.

You did not understand me. I checked the advanced method. There is no option to add more addresses or delay the transaction. Suppose, for example, that I wanted to mix 0.5555 Bitcoin here, and even though you are using Monero to break the link, what happens is that 0.5555 Bitcoin is sent to an address and suddenly 0.5555 Bitcoin appears (excluding service fees) to another address. Therefore, it is easy to connect the two addresses, even if you use Monero. Adding several addresses just as in the CoinJoin method will solve this problem.

We understand your questioning, but this scenario cannot happen. If you send your 0.5555 BTC to our address, then the switch to Monero and Mixero's charges will make your transaction anonymous.
The fees will allow you to have an arrival amount different from an entry amount, and XMR will make it impossible to track the transaction.

So, in your scenario, is it risky for one address in the entire blockchain to send 0.5555 BTC and then, without any link, for another address to receive the same amount? If the two addresses can't be linked, then it doesn't matter if an entry in the blockchain corresponds to an exit elsewhere - this is the case absolutely every day.

Let's imagine 1BTC of dirty money sent to a service, then everyone who receives exactly 1BTC should be worried? Well, no, because the addresses are not linked in any way, which is why our service uses Monero, and why we charge a fee after you've sent it.

Thanks for your questions and comments!