Quote from: BoXXoB on Today at 10:17:19 AM

Quote from: BenCodie on October 16, 2023, 08:55:00 PM

That proves enough in itself.

You're making up your own definition of proof as you go.

I've already answered a bunch of your questions. You're showing no sign of respect for that, instead you're asking more and more questions and the situation still remains the same: you're convinced I'm to be blamed. I don't see that answering your questions gets us anywhere. You're still going to believe the same thing about me. Next it's going to be some other questions and if I don't give exactly the answer you want, you're going to say it's proof, again.

You're delusional and obsessed. If you want blockchain proof, track down investors and you might have an actual trail of the ICO funds. Or if you're able to find some BitDice withdrawal transactions. Chances are though, that investors have already gone through these paths.

I'm not going to undermine the privacy of my transactions for a self-proclaimed Bitcointalk detective. You have no right to expect that of me unless you provide proof that I've knowingly promoted/defended a scam. But you can't because I've not done so.

I'm not making up my own definition of proof. You said you weren't helping with block chain information, I said that's proof that you're guilty. If you had of just went and gotten some information like what you posted, then I would not have made that comment.

I and anyone else here have the right to ask you as many questions as we like, as you, a bounty campaign manager that promoted an ICO that wound up being a massive scam, are obligated to providing information that could help anyone.

I am not delusional or obsessed. You are just not cooperative and get agitated every time you have to post here. You need to put that aside and cooperate when something is asked of you on this topic. That is the cost of what has happened and believe me, based on how much people have lost here, you're paying a very small cost in comparison to what some had lost.

I was never a part of the casino so I have no records like withdrawal history. All that I think is necessary are the blockchain links to validate the ICO proceeds so that the money can be followed...if it eventually touches an active wallet or an exchange wallet, then those who are victims can contact that exchange or watch for movements in the active wallet to grab something.

You need to stop complaining because despite your agitation, I think long-needed discovery is now happening now that you are back. You can't neglect your involvement with BitDice and if you want to walk away from it, you need to put whatever effort you can into helping discover the facts, what went wrong, where the funds went, etc. As there is no concrete information on this yet

But all of that aside....Let's work with what you provided.

Quote from: BoXXoB on Today at 10:17:19 AM

Quote from: BenCodie on October 16, 2023, 08:55:00 PM

That proves enough in itself.

Here's something I can do if it by some miracle helps some actual investors. I doubt BenCodie does anything useful with the information. This is a hotwallet Ethereum address that BitDice used for withdrawals.

https://etherscan.io/address/0xa09dc0bbf43c649537a923a1f796d8d9eb03d1ac

As an added bonus, here is some proof that BitDice lost a lot of money to support my theory that they exit scammed after they had lost more money running the business than they can bear:

A player withdrew a lot of Ethereum from an exploit

https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xa09dc0bbf43c649537a923a1f796d8d9eb03d1ac&p=31

For example a transaction of over 48 ETH

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0b399c549c945ba17132e61dfc3f10a949c04faaf191eebedc694f2106f08cca

Those transactions were consolidated to this address and exchanged using 1inch

https://etherscan.io/address/0xe51f95c72e40005ecda8369eb444fe05a8305d55

In total the user exploited a bug in slots for over 400 ETH and other currencies totaling over 1 million USD. The management also made this public to investors after I convinced them that it was the right thing to do.

So, "New Management" owned over 400 ETH, lost it to an exploit and then decided to exit? Please confirm that is what we are looking at here?

What about transaction information connected with the ICO? Was the hot wallet the same or were the tokens connected to these addresses?

There is something extremely important to note from the activity of the Ethereum hot wallet

https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xa09dc0bbf43c649537a923a1f796d8d9eb03d1ac

The first transaction was in 2018 and the last transaction was in 2022.

This completely invalidates the "old management" and "new management" spiel. Unless you mean to tell me that this multi million dollar operation changed hands, and "new management" trusted "old management" enough to use the same hot wallet address deal the old management being able to have a backup of the private key to the hot wallet?

Sounds unlikely.

Based on this blockchan evidence, I believe that old management and new management are the same people.

I will be conducting more analysis later as it seems this con artist was not one who was vigilant about blockchain data. From the ethereum data just from this one address, we've made a large discovery...that "new and old" management shared a hot wallet shared the same private key.

TLDR: Thanks for the blockchain evidence that so far validates that new and old management are most probably fictional.