Quote from: mirakal on October 17, 2023, 06:23:37 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on October 17, 2023, 02:59:33 AM

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, ...

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

Now, let's consider the scenario where a site is not regulated, and users are anonymous. If, unfortunately, there's an inside job, and the regulators find out that the owners stole users' funds, there could be serious consequences. In such cases, the regulators might investigate and, if necessary, shut down the casino. They would then work to distribute any remaining balances to the users.

However, the distribution of funds will likely involve a legal process. It's highly improbable that these funds would be sent to unknown accounts. Regulators would typically have reporting obligations and a proper framework for returning the funds to their rightful owners. But, as you rightly pointed out, the risk lies in unregulated platforms. If they are seized by authorities, the process could be less transparent and the funds might end up in government treasuries as unclaimed funds.

But before things worked well, when we register in a place , we have an ID which is enough to serve people, and now with all this KYC it doesn't seem to you that it is the same but disguised with the option of That governments at one point can extort casinos and force them to give them all their data or else take away their licenses to operate there? At least it has become clear to me that in Biannce things are like that, and that is in very bad taste, so it may be that your arguments are very good, and in fact they sound Excellent , but I am one of those who do not believe in those things, I don't often believe in what they say on the news or something, we always have to consider that they hurt us or try to manipulate us so that they can do things as they wan t, so it's easy for them to do many things, I don't approve of it being possible that a KYC will get you something good, because I see that as a pure fairy tale, if I am an average player, I am not a player who has a lot of money in a casino and it seems bad to me, now imagine what a player can think Whale?

I think whale players don't like this option at all, even though things for them mean more security, I'm sure they don't like it, because whales have to comply with a lot of KYC things , Unless you're In a very cheap casino like stake.com, there are actually many whales who feel comfortable with the sites, so in these types of things we must be very cautious, to comply with KYC is what I say, being in a casino because Be totally trustworthy to people and not wait for things to go Wrong , so as a player you should always feel comfortable with what you have, where you are playing and what you can achieve when based on any casino, that's why a good casino , that is where one must accept the KYC completely.