Quote from: RockBell on Today at 05:45:29 PM

Quote from: AakZaki on Today at 03:58:55 PM

Was Ten Hag's decision to dump De Gea and buy Onana the best decision? I don't think so. He has conceded 19 times in 11 matches. Pretty bad stats with fantastic transfer prices. Even Onana also did not only make one mistake resulting in a goal. I don't blame him all, because their defence is not very good either. But it seems that Ten Hag's football philosophy is not entirely running smoothly. Many supporters hope De Gea can return to Man United.

Buying players is luck sometimes and Ten Hags' decision to buy Onana is not the best at all, we all know that Manchester United's defense has defaulted not having a good goalkeeper has finished everything, imagine your goalkeeper of a big club like Manchester United conceding goals in every game shows a lot of dangers to the progress of the club. the numbers are just very bad conceding 19 times is hilarious. but even if the defense is bad the keeper should be able to defend the goal post but it got to the extent Manchester United had a loss net. and the last time is Maguire and now is onana, maguire has even tried this season.

In my opinion, the purchase of Andre Onana by Erik ten Hag is the best choice and will defend his goal very well, but in reality I think Andre Onana is very bad as a Manchester United goalkeeper and always concedes goals.
And Andre Onana during his time as Manchester United goalkeeper has conceded 12 times in eight matches in the Premier League, and apart from that in two matches in the Champions League he conceded seven times and only kept three clean sheets in all competitions.
And I agree with you, if Manchester United's defense is not good, at least Andre Onana is a hero who should be able to guard his goal very well. But in reality he is not like that and I prefer David de Gea to return to Manchester United.