Quote from: Jody.Drummer on Today at 01:37:40 PM

Quote from: Plaguedeath on Today at 12:43:58 PM

Quote from: X-ray on Today at 12:21:31 PM

I remember MU fans were over proud toward him and those fans were comparing haaland to the hojlund which is a non sense comparison at this moment. Hojlnud obviously right about that if haaland was in another level yet haaland's performance is dropping a bit due to the lack of creative attacking midfielder in the club. Haaland has won treble winners last season with manchester city. I think that city is likely trying to defend its trophy for this season. Hojlund needs to prove himself to make at least 30 goals total in a season to compete with haaland.

Hojlund aware if he don't have any big achievement compared to Haaland which has won treble winners, so he just a respect to Haaland. If he said he's in a same level or better than Haaland, he will receive many criticism and would destroy his career if he can't perform.

Hojlund is a good player, maybe he will shine in the next 2-3 years.

Yes, if we compare these two players it is clear that in my opinion there is a significant difference and I think we also know it, and also Hojlund himself has responded to the question that he admits that his level is still far behind when compared to Haaland, and one of them we can see from the achievements they have achieved, for Haaland it is clear that he has won the Treble Winner with Manchester City last season and there are only a few clubs that can achieve such high achievements in my opinion because it is clearly very difficult.

True, if Hojlund had responded to the question by saying that his performance was on the same level as Haaland then I would have thought that there would be a lot of criticism coming at him because he had exaggerated and said something that didn't match the facts. But what impressed me was his statement that he was willing to accept the difference in terms of performance and achievements with Haaland, which is certainly difficult to match. On the other hand I admit Hojlund Hojlund does have a pretty good sharpness on the front lines, but it's too early if we compare him from now on with one of the world's best players like Haaland, and well with the talent he already has then I also believe Hojlund will be able to be better and more violent in the next few years, we'll see.

To be compared to Erling Haaland, you have to be remarkable. What's happening with Rasmus Hojlund? Haaland has a combination of speed, strength, and stamina that is rare in football. Hojlund has will, spirit, and determination but also has incredible technical qualities. He still has a lot of development potential at just 20 years old. We have to wait and see what else he shows.
But in terms of support, Haaland has much better support. He has excellent, supportive teammates, plus legendary teacher Pep Guardiola. Hojlund will not be comparable to Haaland. While playing with Erik ten Hag's struggling team.
Bellingham is a player with potential comparable to Haaland. Why don't we see that?