Quote from: bayu7adi on Today at 07:34:23 PM

I recall that it was an era when ICO for the banking industry were all the rage, and many investors were drawn to the world of crypto-based banking. In some instances, ICO investors might have relied on somewhat loose parameters. A team with impressive credentials could be manipulated, a professional whitepaper could be crafted by others, and a website with a .io domain could be built by anyone. It was a realm of total freedom, and there were no checks in place to prevent individuals from launching fake ICOs.

A figure of 151 million dollars is a substantial accomplishment, even if it was the most meticulously executed scam in the ICO world at the time. Presently, money laundering can be easily facilitated, especially within the realm of casinos. They've likely absconded with all the funds they acquired.

However, can you believe that the actual sum is 151 million USD? I mean, websites can be manipulated, and even wallets can receive transfers from other wallets owned by the same person. I am suspicious of ICOs reaching figures above 100 million dollars; they might have manipulated the numbers to attract more investors. The actual proceeds may not be as substantial as claimed.

The above figure was most likely accurate. Bankera itself is just a proxy company for this entire operation. You have Spectrocoin and Pervesk that hold most of the funds. The CEO of Bankera confirmed on telegram that Pervesk is apart of the Bankera ecosystem and he is apart of their board. The Pervesk financial records is publicly available online as well spectrocoin and Bankers. As I said before, Pervesk has most of the funds with a 2022 of 58 million EUR in total assets.

https://rekvizitai.vz.lt/en/company/pervesk/turnover/