Quote from: Strongkored on Today at 09:46:54 AM

Quote from: Xcode7 on Today at 06:32:11 AM

I feel a little sorry for Rasmus Hojlund, even though he has quite good quality but unfortunately his team mates cannot fully support him, currently United's Manchester United performance is very bad and this happens on all fronts so that quality players like Rasmus Hojlund are not able to do much.
So I think it is very unfair to compare Rasmus Hojlund with Haaland because both players are in different places.
Erling Haaland is a little lucky because he plays in the Manchester City team with full support from his teammates so Erling Haaland can bring out all the abilities he has so that Erling Haaland's true quality can be seen.

This is also what I have in mind when talking about the two players, Rasmus Højlund and Erling Haaland have the same playing character where they are very dependent on their teammates and the difference is that Haaland gets that at Manchester City while Højlund gets it quite minimally, especially as both players play in the same league at different times where Haaland is already more experienced in this league while Højlund has only played a few times so he still really needs full adaptation until he can show what the club expects.
Manchester United bought Højlund is priced quite high and of course the club's talent scouts are aware of the potential that this player can show, but everyone needs time and immediately judging that he will not develop in this team after just a few games is quite unfair in my opinion.

I remember a few weeks ago during the summer when Rasmus Højlund joined Manchester United, people were comparing Rasmus Højlund and Erling Haaland because they have the same playing style and Rasmus Højlund could be a good and talented played like Haaland for Manchester United but it seems Manchester United is currently not a good place for young players to use their talents and that's why Rasmus Højlund totally failed so far in Manchester United.