Quote from: BoXXoB on October 18, 2023, 08:42:56 AM

Quote from: BenCodie on October 17, 2023, 08:54:28 PM

So, "New Management" owned over 400 ETH, lost it to an exploit and then decided to exit? Please confirm that is what we are looking at here?

They didn't immediately decide to exit. First they added precautions to avoid something like that in the future like ability for them to double-check large withdrawals. They seemed to continue business as usual after the incident which was odd to me.

This was the biggest loss I saw and probably one of the key factors. It was a dumb mistake on their part because there were never this large amounts in other hotwallets considering by how many withdrawals were not instant and I had to ask to fill hotwallets.

Quote

What about transaction information connected with the ICO? Was the hot wallet the same or were the tokens connected to these addresses?

https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xa09dc0bbf43c649537a923a1f796d8d9eb03d1ac

I don't know. I only ever saw the casino hotwallets, nothing related to ICO. The Ethereum wallet was the only one I was able to locate after all this time. The actual transactions made by investors in the ICO would help more figuring that out.

Quote

TLDR for BoXXoB: Feel free to cool off while I look into things further. Thanks for the blockchain evidence. That so far validates that new and old management are most probably fictional. Do you have any comment on that?

I don't think new management was fictional but I think they worked together for atleast sometime. I unfortunately was never kept in the loop so I lack the details here.

EDIT: My opinion is based on the fact that sometimes when there was a problem, the new management said they had to be in touch with old management (alex) to fix it. This was no longer the case in the end (unless they knowingly kept me in the dark about it).

Well, all I can say at the moment, is that I actually have no more questions to ask you specifically. I think that (despite the frustration) you have provided reasonable answers, and with those answers and especially after the most recent posts and the blockchain information within, that you have (in my opinion) answered everything to the best of your ability.

I understand your frustration as no one likes being under the microscope, or giving answers, especially when they are not guilty. However, I did not come to the conclusion that you weren't possibly involved or have benefited from this case until now.

think that if anyone wants to continue investigating from here, the posts will help them a lot more than if we had not gone back and forth. For now, I decide to just watch on unless something prompts me to look or talk again. It is unfortunate that you have been mixed up in this BoXXoB, and I thank you for your time answering the questions. While I am still not entirely sure of your involvement (as I find it hard to believe that you could not notice issues), I am on your side of the fence slightly now. I hope that you had no part in this and that I am right to step back for now.