Now there will be a big wall of text, sorry:
I have always been amused by this feature of offended people: after they start writing me some absurd accusations, and after that they receive an answer from me, they immediately begin to pretend to be a victim who is attacked.
- Merit abuse by merit source in the Russian local - Here I apparently attacked Zuzma.
- Merit Source - Plagiarist - Here I apparently attacked airfinex.
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144.msg55770640#msg55770640 - Here I apparently attacked nullius.
- CPM right now, right here. - Here I apparently attacked wooI_Ioow.
- Ratimov plagiarizer and now trust abuser - Here I apparently attacked ScumBuster.
- Announce your rank up, merit or any achievements that makes you feel great! - Here I apparently attacked BitcoinGirl.Club.
I constantly attack someone, I just have nothing to do on the forum, I go and attack. It’s funny that in all these cases I was always in the position of responding to the claims, but I am certainly the attacker, and the one who is trying to accuse me is simply a victim of Ratimov’s latest attacks and persecution. Horrible.
I see another victim is trying to show that she has become another target for Ratimov, trying to take an advantageous position where he could be pitied and supported. Only in reality it turns out that the one who came to complain is the catalyst for all problems and conflict. You can read the full dialogue and the beginning of the conflict here: https://ninjastic.space/topic/5442314.0
Start reading from post 214 (this is exactly the message in which GazetaBitcoin starts writing me some complaints), then he starts accusing me of writing shitposts just to fulfill the weekly quota for the signature campaign, then he writes to me that 75% of my merits are earned from shitposting and I am a plagiarist.
Of course, after this, the poor little boy GazetaBitcoin decided to choose the convenient position of the victim, who is attacked and offended by the bad Ratimov. He offends for no reason, Ratimov was just looking for a victim and began to attack, yeah.
Seriously, I already gave my explanation about this in the thread where I described the situation and methods for solving it, I don’t want to repeat this several times.
I would like to clarify some points about the current situation. First, I apologize to all community members who witnessed everything that happened. These posts could have been deleted much sooner if not for the 24-hour rule established in this section.
You know, there is a type of people who are capable of finding a problem out of nowhere and inflating it to cosmic proportions. At the same time, creating conditions for differences in provocations and the spread of gossip. Such people will continue to provoke, even realizing that this will lead to absolutely nothing; for them this is already a kind of excitement, a game. It’s just that people who try to play such games do not take into account the fact that one day they may come across a person who will react to their provocative games differently than they expect.
I’m never the first to offend anyone personally, all complaints against me and all conflicts begin with the fact that another smart guy comes and starts accusing me of things that he is not able to prove and what’s most interesting is that I’ve never dealt with such personalities anywhere I cross paths. Wishful thinking is a characteristic hobby of schizophrenics.
It always amazes me that these schizophrenics have the same defense methods. He writes an accusation to you, you respond to this accusation and this is considered an attack and a search for a victim on my part. It's so stupid it's funny.
When they try to play provocative games with me, trying in every possible way to insult and provoke me, I always answer firmly, without any taboos or forbidden topics. When a user crosses a certain line, nothing is forbidden for me. At the same time, this does not mean that this is my communication style. I have been communicating on this forum for 4 years with different users and there are a lot of users to whom I have never said a single rude word or insult. Why? Because these users do not give a reason to treat them this way. Therefore, you should not be surprised if you are trying to provoke someone, be prepared for a response. GazetaBitcoin tried his best to get a reaction, I fed him a shovelful of crap. I don’t understand why he is so surprised by my answers? Although he in every possible way, childishly naive, believes that he is right in everything, and on my part there are complete abuses and I should be kicked out of DT, and he should be left. He childishly and naively believes that his review is valid, but mine is not and will not soon be.
GazetaBitcoin decided to play this game with me, but something didn’t go according to plan and he couldn’t get away with it. When he realized that he was overwhelmed with anger, which he could not cope with, he moved on to other mechanisms that the forum had endowed him with, namely, broadcasting his anger towards the offender through a trust. What else can the most vulnerable people do, write to the trust and pretend to be a victim who was just attacked, poor thing, take pity on him, poor thing, well, you understand.
I don’t know if there are DT1 on the forum who would agree with GazetaBitcoin and agree with him that this review is as truthful as possible and he wrote it solely on business? Let's take a look at GazetaBitcoin's artwork:
It doesn’t remind me of anything, let’s look back 3 years and remember the old schizophrenic nullius, who is famous for his delusional statements addressed to almost all trusted users:
As they say, find 10 differences. This is a prize for the laziest attempt at revenge and projecting your bruised ego into someone else's trust. He was too lazy to even write something of his own and he just... copied it, what an irony. I think you don’t have to be a great analyst to understand that this was just an excuse to find something to latch on to and inflate the maximum drama out of this story. Whoever refers to the words of a madman risks becoming crazy himself. Ancient folk wisdom.
Just recently this story was discussed and again did not find any support among the community:
Was this all started when you started attacking him for posting those guides/articles, calling him a merit whore?
Why would you think he's doing them for merit? I don't see how merit would have any value to him considering his account status. Sig spammer would be a more logical accusation but he obviously puts a lot of effort into putting those long posts together, and they seem to add value to the forum - especially relative to others that attempt to make posts like his, and it seems like he sites all his sources.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like you're the one out of line for attacking him as a "merit whore", and while he should of just ignored you, how about just cool it both of you? This whole thing is stupid.
For everyone who understands, this story is not worth a damn, but for various slow-witted people this is a reason to release their anger, translating their anger into trust. When he wrote this offensive nonsense to me in a trust, he did not take into account one thing, that he was writing in a trust not to some noob, but to a user with a history, a reputation and a number of completed transactions worth tens of thousands of dollars. His reaction to my answer once again indicated that he believed (and still believes) that only he is allowed to write such things to someone in a trust, and anyone who does the same is considered an abuser. Unfortunately, the reality is less rosy than it was imagined by GazetaBitcoin, and such things do not go unanswered.
Still, I devoted myself to the forum for 4 years, not so that another crazy person would confuse my reputation with a village toilet and dump there a large pile of dubious revelations without a single fact. Well, this is excusable for all trolls who register accounts for accusations, but DT1 is not.
Fun fact, for 3 years I have been accused of a bunch of plagiarism, but so far no one has been able to show at least 1, even in the archive. No one. In short, guys, Ratimov has a lot of plagiarism, but no one knows where he hides it.
As for resolving the conflict, there is only one solution, this is to roll back the system to September 24, 2023, 05:39:45 PM, that is, how everything was at that time. Clean up after yourself in the exact order in which you littered. No discussions, discussions in separate reputation topics, no substitutions for neutral colors and other nonsense. This is the only way this conflict can be resolved; otherwise it can only be resolved in the wet fantasies of various dreamers. Thanks to all.
I once thought about the BitcoinGirl.Club user that he was an extremely inadequate person who allowed himself a lot. I was wrong, because even BitcoinGirl.Club knew the limits of what was permitted and never allowed himself to do too much. Despite our conflicts, he did not try to abuse negative trust and never tried to maliciously provoke through meaningless dialogue. But this patient, under the nickname GazetaBitcoin, believes that he is allowed to do this and he considers it normal to write false accusations to someone without a single piece of evidence. And he still has the audacity to present himself as a victim who was attacked, and also say something about DT1. In order to point out to someone their role in DT1, you need to start with yourself and think carefully about whether you are allowing yourself too much and whether you have the right to ruin someone’s reputation because you had a big butt-hurt out of anger?
GazetaBitcoin, apparently, at some point, believed very strongly in himself and believed that he could write anything and anyone, without the need to prove anything and provide proof of his words. And if someone dares to answer him, he will immediately pretend to be a victim and ask for help from the community.
Someone tell GazetaBitcoin that if he doesn’t like the answers, then the forum has such wonderful functions as ignore.
I foresaw all this even on that day of the conflict, because I know very well the type of such people, their position and further actions, so my answer was already ready in advance.
I have always been amused by this feature of offended people: after they start writing me some absurd accusations, and after that they receive an answer from me, they immediately begin to pretend to be a victim who is attacked.
- Merit abuse by merit source in the Russian local - Here I apparently attacked Zuzma.
- Merit Source - Plagiarist - Here I apparently attacked airfinex.
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144.msg55770640#msg55770640 - Here I apparently attacked nullius.
- CPM right now, right here. - Here I apparently attacked wooI_Ioow.
- Ratimov plagiarizer and now trust abuser - Here I apparently attacked ScumBuster.
- Announce your rank up, merit or any achievements that makes you feel great! - Here I apparently attacked BitcoinGirl.Club.
I constantly attack someone, I just have nothing to do on the forum, I go and attack. It’s funny that in all these cases I was always in the position of responding to the claims, but I am certainly the attacker, and the one who is trying to accuse me is simply a victim of Ratimov’s latest attacks and persecution. Horrible.
I see another victim is trying to show that she has become another target for Ratimov, trying to take an advantageous position where he could be pitied and supported. Only in reality it turns out that the one who came to complain is the catalyst for all problems and conflict. You can read the full dialogue and the beginning of the conflict here: https://ninjastic.space/topic/5442314.0
Start reading from post 214 (this is exactly the message in which GazetaBitcoin starts writing me some complaints), then he starts accusing me of writing shitposts just to fulfill the weekly quota for the signature campaign, then he writes to me that 75% of my merits are earned from shitposting and I am a plagiarist.
Of course, after this, the poor little boy GazetaBitcoin decided to choose the convenient position of the victim, who is attacked and offended by the bad Ratimov. He offends for no reason, Ratimov was just looking for a victim and began to attack, yeah.
Seriously, I already gave my explanation about this in the thread where I described the situation and methods for solving it, I don’t want to repeat this several times.
Wow, what happened here? It's really sad to see such comments. 
I would like to clarify some points about the current situation. First, I apologize to all community members who witnessed everything that happened. These posts could have been deleted much sooner if not for the 24-hour rule established in this section.
You know, there is a type of people who are capable of finding a problem out of nowhere and inflating it to cosmic proportions. At the same time, creating conditions for differences in provocations and the spread of gossip. Such people will continue to provoke, even realizing that this will lead to absolutely nothing; for them this is already a kind of excitement, a game. It’s just that people who try to play such games do not take into account the fact that one day they may come across a person who will react to their provocative games differently than they expect.
I’m never the first to offend anyone personally, all complaints against me and all conflicts begin with the fact that another smart guy comes and starts accusing me of things that he is not able to prove and what’s most interesting is that I’ve never dealt with such personalities anywhere I cross paths. Wishful thinking is a characteristic hobby of schizophrenics.
It always amazes me that these schizophrenics have the same defense methods. He writes an accusation to you, you respond to this accusation and this is considered an attack and a search for a victim on my part. It's so stupid it's funny.
When they try to play provocative games with me, trying in every possible way to insult and provoke me, I always answer firmly, without any taboos or forbidden topics. When a user crosses a certain line, nothing is forbidden for me. At the same time, this does not mean that this is my communication style. I have been communicating on this forum for 4 years with different users and there are a lot of users to whom I have never said a single rude word or insult. Why? Because these users do not give a reason to treat them this way. Therefore, you should not be surprised if you are trying to provoke someone, be prepared for a response. GazetaBitcoin tried his best to get a reaction, I fed him a shovelful of crap. I don’t understand why he is so surprised by my answers? Although he in every possible way, childishly naive, believes that he is right in everything, and on my part there are complete abuses and I should be kicked out of DT, and he should be left. He childishly and naively believes that his review is valid, but mine is not and will not soon be.
GazetaBitcoin decided to play this game with me, but something didn’t go according to plan and he couldn’t get away with it. When he realized that he was overwhelmed with anger, which he could not cope with, he moved on to other mechanisms that the forum had endowed him with, namely, broadcasting his anger towards the offender through a trust. What else can the most vulnerable people do, write to the trust and pretend to be a victim who was just attacked, poor thing, take pity on him, poor thing, well, you understand.
I don’t know if there are DT1 on the forum who would agree with GazetaBitcoin and agree with him that this review is as truthful as possible and he wrote it solely on business? Let's take a look at GazetaBitcoin's artwork:
It doesn’t remind me of anything, let’s look back 3 years and remember the old schizophrenic nullius, who is famous for his delusional statements addressed to almost all trusted users:
As they say, find 10 differences.
This is a prize for the laziest attempt at revenge and projecting your bruised ego into someone else's trust. He was too lazy to even write something of his own and he just... copied it, what an irony. I think you don’t have to be a great analyst to understand that this was just an excuse to find something to latch on to and inflate the maximum drama out of this story. Whoever refers to the words of a madman risks becoming crazy himself. Ancient folk wisdom.Just recently this story was discussed and again did not find any support among the community:
So, Ratimov, you want some drama again?
Was this all started when you started attacking him for posting those guides/articles, calling him a merit whore?
Why would you think he's doing them for merit? I don't see how merit would have any value to him considering his account status. Sig spammer would be a more logical accusation but he obviously puts a lot of effort into putting those long posts together, and they seem to add value to the forum - especially relative to others that attempt to make posts like his, and it seems like he sites all his sources.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like you're the one out of line for attacking him as a "merit whore", and while he should of just ignored you, how about just cool it both of you? This whole thing is stupid.
For everyone who understands, this story is not worth a damn, but for various slow-witted people this is a reason to release their anger, translating their anger into trust. When he wrote this offensive nonsense to me in a trust, he did not take into account one thing, that he was writing in a trust not to some noob, but to a user with a history, a reputation and a number of completed transactions worth tens of thousands of dollars. His reaction to my answer once again indicated that he believed (and still believes) that only he is allowed to write such things to someone in a trust, and anyone who does the same is considered an abuser. Unfortunately, the reality is less rosy than it was imagined by GazetaBitcoin, and such things do not go unanswered.
Still, I devoted myself to the forum for 4 years, not so that another crazy person would confuse my reputation with a village toilet and dump there a large pile of dubious revelations without a single fact. Well, this is excusable for all trolls who register accounts for accusations, but DT1 is not.
Fun fact, for 3 years I have been accused of a bunch of plagiarism, but so far no one has been able to show at least 1, even in the archive. No one. In short, guys, Ratimov has a lot of plagiarism, but no one knows where he hides it.
As for resolving the conflict, there is only one solution, this is to roll back the system to September 24, 2023, 05:39:45 PM, that is, how everything was at that time. Clean up after yourself in the exact order in which you littered. No discussions, discussions in separate reputation topics, no substitutions for neutral colors and other nonsense. This is the only way this conflict can be resolved; otherwise it can only be resolved in the wet fantasies of various dreamers. Thanks to all.
I once thought about the BitcoinGirl.Club user that he was an extremely inadequate person who allowed himself a lot. I was wrong, because even BitcoinGirl.Club knew the limits of what was permitted and never allowed himself to do too much. Despite our conflicts, he did not try to abuse negative trust and never tried to maliciously provoke through meaningless dialogue. But this patient, under the nickname GazetaBitcoin, believes that he is allowed to do this and he considers it normal to write false accusations to someone without a single piece of evidence. And he still has the audacity to present himself as a victim who was attacked, and also say something about DT1. In order to point out to someone their role in DT1, you need to start with yourself and think carefully about whether you are allowing yourself too much and whether you have the right to ruin someone’s reputation because you had a big butt-hurt out of anger?
GazetaBitcoin, apparently, at some point, believed very strongly in himself and believed that he could write anything and anyone, without the need to prove anything and provide proof of his words. And if someone dares to answer him, he will immediately pretend to be a victim and ask for help from the community.
Someone tell GazetaBitcoin that if he doesn’t like the answers, then the forum has such wonderful functions as ignore.
I foresaw all this even on that day of the conflict, because I know very well the type of such people, their position and further actions, so my answer was already ready in advance.