Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 11:33:39 AM

I noticed Ratimov has been deleting content from his own topics, after which he must have reported it and Mods deleted the topics (in that post I linked 58 topics). Speculation is this is to hide traces of his past plagiarism, but I can't know his reasons for sure. The timing is at least peculiar after his DT1-status was questioned again.

Great job, LoyceV!

Perhaps, more and more people will open their eyes now about RATimov's shenanigans. I would have merited your topic but I am out of sMerits. Still, I believe that your topic would deserve at least a 50-merits bomb.

For those interested in more shenanigans done by Ratimov, I present you also a list-with-questions-to-which-he'll-never-answer:

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on October 24, 2023, 06:51:20 AM

1. Why did he delete all his posts (together with OP's content) from the topic where he was hunting airfinex (after airfinex exposed his plagiarism)? Furthermore, why did he do it only after (1) The Pharmacist threatened him that he will distrust him and others will do the same; (2) DireWolf called him out for his miserable attacks toward anyone daring to state the truth about him; (3) LoyceV dotted the I once again, stating that if someone says a truth about Ratimov, then Ratimov gives him a negative feedback?

2. Why did he try to hide this topic in Archival board for years?

3. Why, after hiding this thread in Archival board for years, last week he managed to convince a mod to delete he thread? (For those unaware, I created a topic in Archival board containing all Ratimov's insults just after the mess he did inside AOBT thread. The date of that topic was September 28th. Is it only a coincidence the fact that Ratimov managed to have his tracks deleted just after I created that topic in Archival board? Lol! Or did he anticipate that I'll create this topic and I'll be thorough enough to find also all his hidden evidence incriminating him, thus he started begging mods to delete that thread from Archival board?)

4. Why do you think that he never justified how, in his opinion, the feedbacks he leaves while he is in rage / dementia state respect the correct use of Trust system? Example of such feedbacks (most are negative - attention! - not neutral and without ref link):

Quote

Stupid degenerate, liar and shitposter.

Quote

annoying cretin who will write all sorts of nonsense [...] absolutely incompetent moron [...]

Quote

Liar and provocateur [...] creates conflicts out of nowhere [...] Shitposter and collector of various rumors [...]

^Does the above feedback remind you of TimeLord's feedbacks?

Let's go on with the examples:

Quote

My personal dog

Quote

Useless dumb hysterical bitch

Quote

A fuckhead with a broken head. After being raped by all the WEX employees, taking all his mother's money [...]

So yeah, I wonder what is the connection between such feedbacks and financial deals (the purpose of Marketplace Trust system). Don't you? Especially the rape part.

5. Why did he delete all those feedbacks and / or replaced them (with some which contain less insults but are still insulting) after DT's eyes were on him?

6. Why, based on his "rational" mind, was it needed to give me not just 1 negative feedback, but 2 (!!!), just one after the other, plus a neutral one immediately after, all without ref link and all stating words like "degenerate", "cretin" etc.?

7. Why did he delete all his posts from AOBT thread + the ones from this thread (+ probably hundreds of other similar posts) where he insulted all those people? (Could it be only for looking like a hypocrite ~~nice guy~~, which always talks politely? -- wink wink).

8. Why did he stop using his miserable introduction ("In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme [...]") after he was exposed for plagiarism? If he was not banned then it meant he did not plagiarize anything, right? So why did he stop using that sentence through which he stole other authors' work and presented it like it was his? Again, wink wink.

9. Why does he always accuse someone of same things that are exposed from his miserable character? Example: BitcoinGirl.Club leaves him a feedback reminding of his plagiarism and immediately after Ratimov leaves a retaliatory feedback to BircoinGirl.Club stating that BitcoinGirl.Club is a plagiarist (LOL!) -- again, without presenting any evidence for this claim. Example 2: inside AOBT thread I remind him of his ol' good plagiarism & copy-pasting era, which brought him zillions of merits for stealing someone else's work and then he immediately calls me "GazetaCopyPasteWhore~~Bit~~Shitcoin", accusing me of "eternal copy-paste of other people's works". Excepting that such reactions look like the ones of a 3 years old child, the question still stands.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:05:27 PM

In doing so, he moved some of them to the Russian local board. Undecided

For example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379199

He also emptied then moved to Russian board one of the topics containing his infamous introduction "In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme [...]".

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on Today at 01:27:22 PM

Further evidence: Ratimov also deleted one of the threads where he used his infamous introduction "In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme [...]"

The above link is a quote from a post made by nullius, which quoted a post made by Ratimov where he used that expression. Now Ratimov's post is moved to Russian board and the topic is empty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296174.msg55742220#msg55742220

Quote from: Plaguedeath on Today at 12:41:27 PM

As for "hide traces of past plagiarism", I'm not sure if "hide" is correct terms because isn't it fair for people to delete or edit their posts to correct their past mistakes?

I think there's nothing wrong to do that

Of course it's correct. All thieves try to hide their traces, right? It would be stupid to steal and to not care about leaving traces leading to you. /s

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 01:21:15 PM

Frankly, I did not find enough time to read the GazetaBitcoin topic, so my reply is limited to my posts that have been deleted.

I strongly recommend you to do it. You'll be surprised (BitcoinGirl.Club can confirm

).

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 12:32:18 PM

So basically he moves his topics to archive, deletes his own posts from the topic, then the replies for those posts by others become irrelevant, and finally he reports the entire topic to the moderator to delete the whole topic.

Basically yes. After he noticed that I exposed him for doing that he hurried to bury all the remaining evidence thus, in the end, it would show up that he never plagiarized / never abused Trust system / never insulted anybody / never weaponized the Trust & Merit system.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 12:32:18 PM

By this, he was again making the moderators fool. It's not new from him. The moderators should be ashamed of it.

Unless he has a shenanigan going on with the mod which accepted to delete the topics incriminating him.