Quote from: Trillium on April 20, 2014, 10:20:27 AM

Quote from: Collider on April 20, 2014, 10:09:32 AM

Quote

= 22680 boards (assuming 100% occupancy on all racks/rows as shown in close pics)

So if each board is like the batch 3 product boards then they should be apparently 750 GH/s each

So 22680 * 750 GH/s = 17010000 GH/s = 17010 TH/s = 17.0 PH/s

The current total network hashrate estimate is: 55.5 PH/s (https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty)

So following the assumptions I've made for these calculations, this room would accommodate 30.6% of the total network's hashrate.

Please don't get shitty at KnC only based on my back of the napkin estimations.

Hate to point out an error but as batch 3 products typically consist of 4boards each, every board has ~187 maximum potential hashrate.

Thus total hashrate would be 22680 *187GH/s = 4252TH/s = 4,252PH/s

This would put them to a ~5.2MW power draw, assuming some minor improvements.
This model is in line with the fact that their datacenter is, i think, a 10MW facility.

Right well then their website images are entirely ~~erroneous~~ misleading, as they show 1.5 TH/s systems with 2 boards and 3 TH/s systems with 4 boards. Thank you for the clarification.

Ah I see where the source of the confusion lies.
Those on the website right now are their new 20nm modules (aka Neptune, actually the same pics as the Jupiters in 2013) which are not yet in production (though tapeout was somewhere in march or late february i believe)

The ones in the datacenter are old 28nm, essentially the same as in the Jupiters, upgrade boards like on the website now.