I am still trying to come to terms with the coined word: "split decision " that was used in stealing the victory away from Ngannou in this fight that was obvious even to the blind who the actual victor is. If we're told before hand that it's a fixed boxing match like the ones in the WWE we will understand and shield our swords of words against this denial but instead they're making it a controversial debate by their decision of who the winner is.
This is the problem of having a judge with differing perspective when watching the match. Probably those judge that side to Fury typically only looking to Fury points. There’s a chance too that they are trying to save boxing reputation since Fury is undefeated on boxing while beaten badly by an MMA fighter.
I believe this kind of decision is predetermined by whoever big people behind this match. The match is obviously in favor to Ngannou yet no one can complain to an official decision just because the winner is a boxing champ.