Quote from: Little Mouse on November 02, 2023, 03:57:40 PM

Quote from: 1miau on November 02, 2023, 01:27:11 AM

And obviously, someone who openly hates gambling is not a good pick to advertise a gambling brand.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on October 26, 2023, 09:19:33 PM

Why do you think ~~BenCodie~~ someone needs to accept your philosophy in his life and can't have his own and vice versa.

Everyone may have different perspectives and opinions.
I'm trying my best to give maximum exposure to coins.game through the signature campaign. I'm following my strategy for achieving so.

Of course, everyone can have different perspectives and opinions. I don't know how often I should mention this, again and again. Everyone can hate gambling, they are entitled to have that opinion. But then, the person in question should not get butthurt if their hypocrisy gets called out and we did that, backed up by legitimate proof, like the picture I've posted in the topic of CryptopreneurBrainboss.
We should always remember that BenCodie started the whole discussion when he acted butthurt that other people called him out for his hypocrisy.

So, BenCodie has shown his hypocrisy to everyone (he even opposed cryptofrka's Merit source application) and at the same time, he's not able to face any criticism for his actions.

Quote from: Little Mouse on November 02, 2023, 03:57:40 PM

If you feel like CM isn't doing the job perfectly, feel free to reach out to them and explain.

That's an option, but PMing a bounty manager is something I'm very hesistant because all the other options need to have failed already, like nice explanations for the abusers in question.
PMing a campaign manager for such things might result in more unnecessary spam for campaign managers.
But yes, it's an option.

Quote from: Little Mouse on November 02, 2023, 03:57:40 PM

Quote from: 1miau on November 02, 2023, 01:27:11 AM

And yes, campaign managers not checking his comments properly are an issue too.

This is irritating and unnecessary here I think (not obvious because you are free to say anything you want).

It's neither irritating nor unnecessary, it's very important to mention that. Because campaign managers are getting paid to provide a good service and that includes to select the participants, which are suited best to give a service the best advertising.
We have had some very lazy campaign managers here but luckly the whole situation has improved. I can personally outline the practives of icopress, whose professionality is key to provide a good campaign management.
As a service operator, I would hire him without hesitation because I would consider my advertising funds spent very wisely.

Do you think in the gambling section, everyone is a gambler or likes gambling? Of course, no. There are a lot of users pretending to be a gambler/like gambling just for the sake of filling their weekly posting requirements. The difference between Bencodie and those impersonators is- they are impersonators while Bencodie isn't. He is honest at least.
[/quote]
It's a big difference if someone just doesn't care much about gambling or if he's opposing it openly. What are we even talking about, if someone doesn't like gambling, no need to advertise it for him. That's what we are talking about the whole time.
Most gambling sites are know for requiring gambling-related posts and it's just not making any sense to have low-quality posters participating there or even people opposing gambling.
For example, as a gambling service owner, I would go for people like Trofo, cryptofrka or CLS63 as participants over BenCodie any time.

Quote from: BenCodie on November 02, 2023, 09:09:02 PM

@JollyGood just stop. There has not been any past hypocrisy instead of your misinterpretation of whirlwind where

All the comments written by JollyGood here are very legitimate.
And not just JollyGood was a bit surprised about your hypocrisy, many more members shared the same view.

Quote from: decodx on November 02, 2023, 07:02:35 PM

Quote from: 1miau on November 02, 2023, 01:27:11 AM

And yes, campaign managers not checking his comments properly are an issue too.
A campaign manager is responsible to select suited participants to ensure that the service is advertised the best way. Campaign managers are getting paid for that by the service.
And obviously, someone who openly hates gambling is not a good pick to advertise a gambling brand.

He came back to the forum last December after taking a long break and seemed like he just wanted to join some signature campaigns to earn money. He put in an application with Chipmixer like two days after he started posting again. But before that, I never saw him post anything about gambling on here. Makes me wonder if he's telling the truth that he's always felt this way about it. Hard to get a read on what his deal is.

Nice reminder, I totally forgot about it. Cheesy

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.msg61460727#msg61460727
"Full" means "apply now". Cheesy