No, blockchain analysis has *always* had those coins "on their radar", getting rejected from a coinjoin does nothing to change that. It is the radar that caused the rejection in the first place, the rejection does not cause the radar.
OK, fair enough. That makes sense, but that's not what I was getting at. It's obvious to me that blockchain analysis considers there is something wrong with those UTXOs, hence their assessment and recommendation to zkSNACKs, don't allow this. But now the money is on the move. The owner of the "dirty" bitcoin is trying to "clean" them through Wasabi. Blockchain analysis noticed it, so they can employ more resources to follow the trail and identify the "culprits".