You called me out for only responding with sarcasm and by not contributing to the topic.. This is the second time I am asking you the same serious questions your glasses were probably too foggy to see.
No one ever claimed that "it sucks morally to use SBF's money"[/i]
So you think it is morally correct to
use money coming from crime?
It's harmless to rely on these reports even if they are inaccurate because there's no consequences for users who are mistakenly identified as "tainted".
Will they be able to enjoy private money?
-----
No, blockchain analysis has *always* had those coins "on their radar", getting rejected from a coinjoin does nothing to change that. It is the radar that caused the rejection in the first place, the rejection does not cause the radar.
The rejection would not happen at all had Wasabi not partnered with them. Then although existent, their radar would be useless.
Weapons would be useless in a war if there were no soldiers to use them.