Quote from: holydarkness on November 12, 2023, 05:57:12 PM

It seems he's... revamping his feedback?

Correct. (As yahoo already knows): Archive [a.t] [w.a.o]

Quote from: yahoo62278 on November 11, 2023, 11:30:35 PM

I can respect you wanting your feedbacks to be accurate though.

And I'm not finished - had you continued scrolling, you might have noticed all of the negatives have been *rewritten* verbatim leaving just a mixture of neutral and positives pre-this week - next up are the neutrals to be rewritten verbatim. The positives can stay as is to give context as to when they were first issued. (that doesn't mean I'm finished with them, rather they have been grouped (or will be grouped) together - subject to further review)

The OP is again playing the victim knowing full well the original trust feedback was posted on the quoted date (yet he's just waited until now to burst into tears) - IIRC he even made mention of it in one of his previous grandstanding threads.

But thanks OP for going on the record as saying of the 137 negative (and overall 443 trust feedbacks) that is the ONLY trust feedback that you consider to be incorrect. (that's less than a quarter of one percent)

OTOH Feedback is correct:

I don't trust the OP and wouldn't do a trade with the OP.