Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 08:38:17 AM

I did not mean it's miserable amount by any mean but when someone is questioning a person who held 500 BTC in a single wallet

You didn't say it was a miserable amount, but you criticize why they cry for the loss of 2BTC and compare it to a larger amount which has not been lost. Honestly, if I were to lose 2 BTC, I wouldn't be surprised if I started crying.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 08:38:17 AM

Vod's trying to create an argument with the forked coin. When the contract was created there were no term for the forked coin. If there were any terms about it and it was mishandled not following the term then we could have an argument. It's a very simple case, the contract was about the BTC to be held and send back safely. According to the contract the BTC were sent back safely to the original owner. So, there are no scope for questioning anything else.

Again, it sounds to me like you're throwing away other people's money lightly. Plus, maybe you even seem a little biased. I interpret it this way, if the contract does not specifically state that the fork coins belong to the escrow service, then they are the property of the original Bitcoin owner.

Honestly, if the owner of the funds is happy with the outcome, I'm ok with that. How it all ended

Quote from: theymos on November 30, 2019, 10:55:23 PM

Quote from: theymos on November 18, 2019, 02:32:01 PM

The major forks for the BTC previously held by OgNasty will be liquidated sometime before the end of the year. When this is done, you'll see a bunch of BTC sent to 17RTT[...]. The forkcoins for the other BTC will not be liquidated soon.

The result of the liquidation of 500 BTCs' forkcoins was:
14.272715 from BCH
6.818999 from BSV
0.442951 from BTG
= 21.534665 BTC

Due to having low value, other forkcoins on this 500 BTC were not transferred.

I had no desire to play the market here, so the forkcoins were sold in several transactions spread throughout November. And there was no particular reason for doing it in November as opposed to earlier or later: it was just a convenient time.

But yes, not everything was done fairly and professionally. @theymos statement about GBYTE airdrop claiming by funds holder (OgNasty):

Quote from: theymos on December 02, 2019, 10:01:06 PM

I stand by my previous analogy:

Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2019, 04:27:30 PM

I suppose an analogy would be a fine-art storage company selling selfies with famous artworks.

It's annoying because:
- Not asking was unprofessional.
- Taking a private key out of cold storage always has some amount of risk.
- I now have to spend time on this drama.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 08:38:17 AM

I am now concerned about the BPIP project. He owns this project. Can anyone tell confidently that he did not put a simple code and storing everyone browsing information including the IPs? What guarantee we have that your, mine and others who used BPIP, our browsing history are not going to be used against us?

I don't know why you are worried here, do you think that Vod is so dangerous and malicious?
What exact information can BPIP collect about us that all other sites on the Internet do not? IP address, type of device, operating system, screen resolution and?