Now this discussion makes me wonder. Is there any body who audited the code? Some body who is not paid by Wasabi or Kruw I mean.
Pmalek, Kruw telling the truth is of course never a thing that is going to happen. I do not believe Kruw or Wasabis team thinks BA is doing any thing good to Wasabi or Bitcoin. Anyway. Whether they think or not is just as bad. If they think it is doing any good then they are straight up our enemy. If they do not think so then they are huge liars to be avoided.
Kruw asks very malicious questions and it shows their true intentions. He stated something and I asked two yes / no questions which he has been avoiding for a week now,
No one ever claimed that "it sucks morally to use SBF's money"[/i]
So you think it is morally correct to
use money coming from crime?
It's harmless to rely on these reports even if they are inaccurate because there's no consequences for users who are mistakenly identified as "tainted".
Will they be able to enjoy private money?
And the radio silence is showing how cunning this Wasabi team can be. I say Wasabi team including Kruw because there is no way some body spends this amount of time defending Wasabi without a correlation to their team.
I did not ever believe there would be some body in the Bitcoin world who I could put above Craig Wright on the list of people I would never trust. It looks like I found a winner.
But maybe the questions have not been answered because Kruw either ignores my replies or put me on his Ignore List. If some body else could ask them for me I would be appreciative.