Now this discussion makes me wonder. Is there any body who audited the code? Some body who is not paid by Wasabi or Kruw I mean.
Who knows. I'm certainly not going to bother wasting my time. Wasabi already has a critical flaw in that it directly funds blockchain analysis and lets them censor users based on secret criteria. You can see the code for this here:
https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/blob/24843a7840e05056077ad46664a48f62ffb70c4f/WalletWasabi.Tests/UnitTests/WabiSabi/Backend/CoinVerifierTests.cs#L209-L211. Nobody not associated with Wasabi is going to waste their time looking for any further flaws, when this one is already more than enough to mean no one should ever use Wasabi.
Maybe that explains why Wasabi had horrendous address reuse before they finally got round to patching it:
https://nitter.cz/HillebrandMax/status/1586249382097088512#mBut maybe the questions have not been answered because Kruw either ignores my replies or put me on his Ignore List. If some body else could ask them for me I would be appreciative.
Don't take it personally. Kruw has been ignoring stuff he doesn't like or can't answer for the best part of a year now:
Step 1 - Get shown blockchain evidence of Wasabi address reuse
Step 2 - Ignore said evidence
Step 3 - Ask for the evidence you've just ignored
Step 4 - Go to Step 1