Quote from: robelneo on Today at 11:01:50 AM

Very interesting I may not agree with you creating a thread for this...

Well, let me explain to you the main reason why it is a good idea to create such a thread: because I think it will be a deterrent. Eventually people will know that there is a thread to report those who don't read the comments on the first page and I think that will make more than one person read them before writing the first thing that pops into their head to meet the quota.

Quote from: robelneo on Today at 11:01:50 AM

Obviously, BlackBoss_ is not subscribed to the Bitcointalk bot, if he is, he will address your call out and maybe delete his thread or apologize, what's your take if you call out the member and he did apologize or delete his thread will he still be part of your report?

If he disagrees, he can challenge it in the same reporting thread. But I will give you another example that I did not put on that list:

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on November 02, 2023, 02:42:45 PM

Quote from: freedomgo on November 02, 2023, 02:25:36 PM

I didn't know that the forum signature campaign originated on Bitcointalk.

Apparently you can't read either, or I don't know which is worse: you didn't feel like reading the few comments in the thread where it is clearly shown that it is based on a false supposition, since they didn't originate here:

Quote from: jokers10 on November 02, 2023, 10:58:15 AM

Quote from: Zoomic on November 02, 2023, 10:33:52 AM

Do you know that Signature Campaign is an invention of bitcointalk.org?

It is not so.

He later admitted the mistake, and as it is longer ago than the other two cases, I have not included it in the report.