Quote from: digaran on Today at 03:06:33 PM

...

Thanks for proving once again, that you are just here for trolling, derailing any possibility to find a solution and sowing discord among DT members. And it's visible for everyone, that you are the problem!

But when we are at it, let me address this. Each DT member, who was mentioned in the post above, if you want to review the issue:
The following post is my current suggestion how to solve the issue, where I've already conceded ground:

Quote from: 1miau on Today at 12:40:37 PM

Quote from: digaran on Today at 12:16:22 PM

@1miau, why is it so hard for you to explain for everyone just for one time, and then go on with your life?

@digaran
I'm just trying to find a solution where we both can agree on. That's what LoyceV also wants us to do.
We can also wait for a call that is given from 2 or 3 Top 10 or 20 DT members and both of us have to accept that.
Repeated rants don't bring any solution, its just sowing discord.

Another suggestion for mikeywith, where I'm ready to concede ground:

Lets lock this topic until 01.01.2024 that the dust settles.
You can watch my feedbacks and trust list changes until then.
If you think, from now on until 01.01.2024 there would be "abuse" according to you, you could open this topic again, presenting evidence.
The outcomes:
- If the evidence is weak, DT will judge that accordingly.
- If the evidence is true and DT confirms this, I'll accept further distrusts from DT members.
- If there's no abuse, the topic will remain closed and we will move on.

You could review my trust feedback and trust list any time, from every entry that happens from now on until then. That way, you could interfere into my DT decisions for some time.
So you see, I'm ready to concede massive ground to find a solution here. I'm stepping back from the demand that any interference into my DT decisions is not acceptable.
I'm stepping back from my demand.
So, as I've said I'm ready to concede this massive ground to you.
How about that?

Any DT member voices if this is a reasonable approach are appreciated.

Another approach could be just to lock the topic and if mikeywith still feels it's an issue, he can re-open it on 1st January 2024. That way, some time would pass to find a more level-headed solution as we will be able to review it with a bit distance. Then, a better solution could be found with much less drama.

Happy to hear any answers.