Quote from: Wiwo on November 19, 2023, 07:52:02 AM

Quote from: EarnOnVictor on November 19, 2023, 06:57:53 AM

You see, people don't know many things, they believe everything can be done the way anyone likes it, but it's not always so. In a sane world, there are rules and everyone has their quote to contribute, or else things would go out of control. Talking about the house's responsibility in this context, in some countries, you would not be able to operate a casino without fully registering and being regulated, and if you do all these, you have to obey the rules as operators. One of the rules is for you to have the welfare of your customers at heart, particularly those who could be going through financial and addiction challenges. As much as the house would not know everyone personally to build relationships with them to know the problem to ship in their advice and recommendations, they are mandated to have the "Self-exclusion" feature on their website.

This applies to land-based casinos too, and it's just like signing an agreement that such a person will not visit their casino for a certain period due to a specific reason. However, I've read a series of cases that casinos do not obey as they allow such people to cancel the feature and start gambling again. But the government should not hear such as it's a very serious offence in some countries like the UK as it's a layer to force the house to take responsibility too.

Well, this may sound very easy in words but not in practice, because at some point, you still have to know that even though those casinos that are registered are mandated to follow regulatory guidelines for their operations and players' welfare, but even at that, there still will focus more on the revenue for the operation so for such it becomes obviously clear that not all the restriction rules will be followed by the casino and that have been the major issues as regards to casinos taking the responsibility to control their client's gambling behaviour.

The highest that they can do is to set an age limit which has already been set to 18+ or better still have a self-exclusion feature, but anything outside these two, the casino sees it as a drawback for their profit since they are in the business for the profits.

The other countries strictly implement the rule that they do not allow a minor to enter a casino, whether it is an online or land-based casino. I also don't see anything wrong with this step they are taking.

And this kind of implementation that a country is doing is really good because it only shows a real concern for minors, and it is good to see it being implemented in all countries that are legitimately allowed to operate gambling in each country, if that is where it stands.