Anyone with even a basic comprehension of the English language can clearly understand the context of those two statements - one is talking about bitcoin at a technical level (where there is no such thing as individual sats) while the other is talking about blockchain analysis heuristics. As I've pointed out before, your continual deliberate misrepresentations mean you are either deliberately lying to fuel your narrative, or you literally don't understand the first thing about what you are writing.
Good job diverting the topic away from the questions you repeatedly refuse to answer again though.

o_e_l_e_o, I did answer you:
Don't take it personally. Kruw has been ignoring stuff he doesn't like or can't answer for the best part of a year now:
Step 1 - Get shown blockchain evidence of Wasabi address reuse
Step 2 - Ignore said evidence
Step 3 - Ask for the evidence you've just ignored
Step 4 - Go to Step 1
o_e_l_e_o, didn't you hear Peter Todd?
https://youtu.be/oPNFdhZUGmk?t=162I want you to admit you heard Peter Todd and then explain why you are still attacking Bitcoin privacy software.