Quote from: Shenanigan on Today at 03:28:59 PM

Quote from: Lucius on Today at 02:46:06 PM

The fact that someone allegedly had 11 BTC does not mean that this person must know how to sign a message or that he has any broader knowledge about Bitcoin. I have personally seen a lot of people who bought BTC a long time ago and then found themselves in a situation where they did not know even the most basic things, and these were not trolls, but people who really had the BTC they were talking about. Possession of something and knowledge about it do not have to be related to each other.

You are absolutely right in this statement. But that doesn't mean my assumption is wrong.

And if you are finished, then I hope you don’t mind me expressing my vision of the situation in more detail?:

I believe that OP did not lose any bitcoins. I propose OP simply made up this sad story so that out of pity or solidarity they would pour him merits. He didn't succeed. I’m glad that the forum’s audience is getting smarter every year and is less and less susceptible to such provocations

I also do not exclude other theories, the proposal of Pmalek also makes sense:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475428.msg63217689#msg63217689

Quote

We have that maniac (fxsurfer, antikvark, whatever the name is) who returns every couple of months and creates a few threads bashing bitcoin, everyone argues with him, and then he disappears, only to come back again some day.

Quote from: Lucius on Today at 02:46:06 PM

It would be logical to write what you think the topic should be locked for - and you already wrote that in your post "OP is troll, no proofs, no signed messages". Although keep in mind that mods don't have to share your opinion and won't do anything.

Is such a free interpretation suitable for a report? I thought the report should be short. It turns out there is no single standard form for reports? Please do not evade away from newbie answers and provide at least a sample of a correct report

I wonder signing a message is no more important then placing a fractional coin in the address then withdrawing it.

it is more costly to more in 0.0001 and then pull out 0.0001 although he could set it to 1 sat per byte and would lock it up at no cost to with draw it.

But I am thinking how did the money get pulled from a core wallet as described by him I am not so sure what was done to pull it.

He claims it was not launched so I am not sure how it could be taken if it is not launched.

other then the hacker had full control of the pc via remote like anydesk.