Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 10:11:03 AM

Quote from: tg9 on Today at 07:37:01 AM

rambling navel gazing

Incorrect.

I am DT 1.

Well, then I do not know why you show struck out when I check the trust list. I have not touched that, plus 98789 the other day I checked had: +1 / 0 / 0 (the +1 comes from HCP from the testing I managed for Duke/SmackThatAce). tg9 also was still 0 / 0 / 0 (right now it is 0 / 1 / 0 because FatFork gave me neutral trusted feedback).

I took screenshots in case it shows this way only for me. That would be weird, though, because I have not customized my trust list (I did not do it for 98789, I have no reason to change that). To the best of my knowledge newbie accounts cannot post screenshots, so here is a link to imgur with the two screenshots I took: https://imgur.com/a/jUmQgwo

Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 03:51:59 PM

Fyi you can answer multiple members in the same post

And, what have I been doing? I was replying to the person who complained about "walls of text". I am not going to quote every person (but you can see I know that because I did it a handful of times as 98789 and I also did it in the Freebitco as tg9), this time I did because it was just two answers, but I won't be doing that for 5~10+ people.

You are adding nothing. I already provided some evidence that should add to my case and you only keep playing the bad cop and talking shit. The Betcoin.ag chat message is still there, usernames cannot be edited (at least to the best of my knowledge) and I am 98789 as I have always been. I also tweeted from the X account that I have used for years (one that conveniently I had not deleted, because I have been considering doing so for a while).

Here are screenshots from Betcoin, you could have simply gone there and checked by yourselves that I sent the message shown in the first screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/FZGYCZx. The second screenshot shows my user ID, which you can compare against the one on 98789's signature (Betcoin.ag changed referral IDs, but before someone makes the smartass comment saying that the referral IDs are different, pay attention that they now start with an u instead of an r, they must have changed that at some point, it would be quite a coincidence that I was a different user and the IDs matched). Of course editing HTML or just replacing the URL would be very simple, but I mentioned I could record a short video to discard that possibility and you said nothing.

You have not proven a single inconsistency, you are not either suggesting a reasonable way to prove (or add evidence) that I control 98789. From the "false claim" from FatFork's feedback, which goes against the "innocent till proven guilty" principle, I won't believe your crap that if I reset 98789's password you will believe me. Seeing how things have unfolded, you will come up with additional excuses to say that that is still not enough. Being accused of "false" claims ("claims" would be a different thing, I have never asked you to just take my word for it and anyone saying otherwise is a liar), also proves that people here run to whatever conclusions they want, and that going through all this crap at the very beginning was not a bad idea.

Ultimately, you can believe whatever you want. I have been very transparent about things, for that same reason I clarified to the person that suggested chatting from my crypto-games account that usernames can be changed there (so that would prove nothing). Besides the more concrete evidence (message from 98789 on Betcoin.ag and Tweet from my=98789's X account), I have also described events that happened around the time I was active in the past and mentioned things that only 98789 would know.

If you want to call me whatever you want for being upfront about this, then do it. Even more, make the feedback red and I will just forget about this forum. I saw some idiot that keeps spamming about reverse computing, calls everybody nazi and insults people and he is still there, happy about life; back in my 98789's days, I remember "Codishmumu" was banned simply for spamming, and while it is true that "she" was spamming, "she" at least was a friendly user. Add to that that back in the day when I reported lolgato/logato1 no one gave a fuck (check my post as 98789, it was a solid report following the format that was required back in the day).