Quote from: yenerbatmaz on Today at 01:39:38 AM

What about multi hosting, deploying a website in multiple locations, and not picking as your residence one of the few places on Earth where the government is on a psychotic mission to eradicate individual liberty.

If you can't find a way to make a stand against central authority and oppression and would rather immediately bend over at the face of the slightest perceived threats, then crypto is not the place for you amigo...

I think you're mixing things up.

A multi hosting system normally only serves to ensure that the website is always up and running, when something on the server goes down. And we come back to the same thing, to support a website like Bitcointalk, you have to use the best servers in the world, which are in the USA or Europe. You can even use multi hosting, with servers in the USA and Europe, but these types of actions are coordinated between the authorities on both continents.

I recently saw a documentary about Cyberbunker. Take a look, and see how it was possible to take down one of the biggest and best servers on the darkweb.

Note, I am not saying that I agree with the way the authorities act in this field. However, this does not imply that the forum protects itself against possible attacks from the authorities. It's better to continue to have a space to "fight against centralization" than to be left without that space.

The other day I heard a very interesting phrase: "In the 21st century, remaining anonymous is almost impossible. But the more discreet you are, the more easily you can do what you want without being seen."

And I think that's what we want to be, to continue without being visible, so that we can defend what Satoshi created that helps us fight financial centralization. The forum was not created to combat centralization, but to debate the tool that does it. If this forum ceases to exist, this fight may be lost.