Quote from: philipma1957 on Today at 05:11:43 AM

388xx seems ok but looking for 40404

43,210 - could be fun too, on the way up to 45,678.90

Quote from: DirtyKeyboard on Today at 07:38:28 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on Today at 05:11:43 AM

388xx seems ok but looking for 40404

Noooo! Lol, good one!

ChartBuddy's 24 hour Wall Observation recap
.

.

Buddy, why didn't you remind me that November only has 30 days? What's that? You were too busy starting to lift? My bad.
The data we have for November; 1 day is 1 second. Be careful.
https://i.imgur.com/Lw0AyPd.gifv

You have come up with quite a few variations.....

Quote from: DirtyKeyboard on Today at 08:06:36 AM

Amazing.

Bitcoin Miner AntPool to Refund Record $3M BTC Transaction Fee
AntPool said it would verify the identity of the sender if they sign an on-chain message via another bitcoin transaction using the same message – which will prove ownership.
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2023/11/30/bitcoin-miner-antpool-to-refund-record-3m-btc-transaction-fee/

On one of the bitcoin-related podcasts (I cannot recall which one), I had heard that there were some issues regarding how that transaction had started out as stolen funds.. I am not sure if it is true, but it makes it possible to refund the fees but not the body of the transaction that was already stolen.. which was something like 55/56 BTC.. like mentioned in that quoted article.. so then sometimes there could be questions about if refunding the fees could end up going to the person who stole the money or the original owner.. and sometimes it might be a bit difficult to sort out which is which (or who is who).