Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:21:28 PM

If we are already talking about loopholes, how should we understand Jabler.io, which does not fall under the announced ban?

They are a mixer gateway, connecting investors with "pure" coins and mixer users. Despite all the bans, they are still allowed to remain present, as they are the main sponsors of this year's Bitcointalk Community Awards contest. Even the manager announced their promotional campaign in the future.
icopress says that he asked and received approval from theymos, so I wonder what's going on here. Jabler only offers mixer software, and investors for a certain percentage and that is acceptable for the forum, while ordinary mixers are prohibited [...]

I admire how you subtly illuminate what I shared with you (although I did this because sooner or later I would have been asked, and also because I support openness). Perhaps, thanks to your efforts, a lot of trolls will join this discussion, and this annual event will lose another sponsor.

First of all, I didn’t say that I received approval, I said that “I asked”, although I would call it "leniency" .. besides, this is a temporary measure until I announce the results of the event (for now that's all I can say).
It’s good that you mentioned the campaign .. if you noticed, my signature includes information about sponsorship and an extremely accurate advertising slogan of what Jambler essentially is (namely software, and the opportunity to make money on short-term investing).
Jambler existed in the form in which it exists now even before the ban, so it makes no sense to talk about some kind of loophole.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:21:28 PM

[...] Jambler only offers mixer software, and investors for a certain percentage