Quote from: Igebotz on Today at 10:04:51 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 09:33:44 AM

Quote from: Igebotz on Today at 09:29:10 AM

It could be an insider (typist, editor, photocopier) who gained access to the information, but does that make it an official account? I'm talking about how this account might be used to deceive individuals.

I was hoping they confirm being real. That would be interesting. I can't see how they'll "deveive" people here.

I was also hoping they would do it after those tags but no they disappeared.

I bet there are already 1-2 idiots in their DM asking "how to recover stolen funds," and this is how victims are further duped. Lol

Having impersonated CIA, FBI, and FIOD officers on this forum would cause more harm than benefit.

theymos are these usernames allowed?

Quote

Add +31 (0) 6 ~. If it's government, they're not working in the weekend Wink

Switzerland Why would an anti-crime organisation not function on weekends, considering weekends are when the majority of frauds occur??

Quote from: joker_josue on Today at 09:58:46 AM

Another point that should serve as reflection is that, if he was a hater, the probability of him having made more posts on this subject and even on this OP would be high. Or don't you think so?

The account continues to be accessed.

I would say those early warning tags sent the bastard to exile.

And cost me 90 minutes to about 2 hours time before I pulled my signature. Which means If the government goes after me.

I will need to get a lawyer to defend myself. Which in turn means I have to go after those that posted the negative trusts. Any of us attacked be the government because we were too slow will need.

All info from the forum about the 'warning' poster and the taggers of it. In order to defend ourselves for being too slow to remove the signatures.

Did you bother to look up people with the signatures still intact and let them know you had no real evidence to tag no you did not.