I think, we can be confident to say that when the block subsidy will be near zero, bitcoin will be a very popular and widely used currency with very high number of users and transactions.
I would not be so confident if we start rejecting random transactions we are ideologically opposed with.
Ordinals are not part of traditional bitcoin transactions, they just abuse the bug. Is it really censorship if we don't let others to abuse the bug? Ordinals are damaging the bitcoin and you guys protect the ordinals, doesn't make sense for me. Even in censorship-free world, abusers should be punished.
By the way, answer to these problems is Monero. Centralized exchanges ban Monero and Monero is also the most privacy focused currency. Move on Monero.
I am already there pal, and you should consider moving too. But that does not mean I will support censorship on bitcoin.
Censorship, censorship. 100% censorship-free is a failure and we already reap the results.
Is bitcoin for everyone who want to improve privacy and independence from financial institutes or is it only for rich people?
And is bitcoin for everyone who wants to use it, or is it only for people who use it in the ways that we decide are acceptable?
I highly respect your every opinion but I can't agree with you on this particular task. You say that bitcoin is for everyone but Ordinals kill it for everyone. I, like many people, can't use Bitcoin because of ordinals. Now ordinals spammers use bitcoin instead of genuine bitcoin users. Imagine you live in a world where everyone protects rules but there is a guy who robs and kills people, should that person be punished or not despite the fact that everyone else protects rules? Someone might argue with me that it will be censorship to get rid of that one bad person but if you don't get rid of him/her, he/she will get rid of all of you. 100% censorship-free system is impossible, even for Bitcoin. Ordinal spammers abuse network, they are abusers.