Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 09:38:26 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on Today at 09:29:35 AM

Objectively speaking, if zkSNACKS' coordinator did not hire the services of a blockchain analysis company, would Wasabi be in that list?

No, for the following reasons:

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on November 01, 2022, 11:22:02 AM

Wasabi has been reusing addresses, a lot, which has resulted in a lot of post-mix coins being linked back to pre-mix coins and being de-anonymized. And then the devs have been on Twitter, both defending that it is "acceptable" and also lying about it entirely.

Here's an example thread: https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586249382097088512#m
Gets shown address reuse, claims it isn't from 2.0 and that it has never happened in 2.0. Then gets shown address reuse from 2.0, and says they've already patched it. How could they have patched it while also claiming it has never happened? They are lying somewhere.

Here's another example: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872#m
And dozens more: https://nitter.it/wasabistats

But the devs don't care, because apparently some address reuse is "acceptable": https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586321068129939456#m

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 13, 2023, 05:28:03 PM

Wasabi coinjoins creating outputs which can be 100% linked to a specific input: https://mempool.space/tx/dae13b2d015587a3033d7ab7949a7efa6d6ed7aa782168b0651ab37a2d8390f8
Wasabi coinjoins reusing addresses, leading to users being doxxed: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872
Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)

"Someone reused a Bitcoin address" is not a reason why coinjoins are bad. You were already called out by Peter Todd and proven to be a liar:
https://youtu.be/oPNFdhZUGmk?t=162

Everyone reading this post should be aware that o_e_l_e_o has KNOWINGLY been spreading this lie that "address reuse" is a "flaw" in Wasabi coinjoins even AFTER being directly exposed by Peter Todd:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5286821.msg63175583#msg63175583

So the question is no longer "is o_e_l_e_o correct that Wasabi's coinjoins are flawed", the question we are now asking ourselves is "why is o_e_l_e_o deliberately trying to spread a lie about Wasabi's coinjoins being flawed over and over despite having his lies directly exposed already?".