Quote from: Taskford on December 17, 2023, 12:47:15 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 16, 2023, 08:31:26 PM

Quote from: goaldigger on December 16, 2023, 04:26:09 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 16, 2023, 02:40:30 PM

Quote from: logfiles on December 15, 2023, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: rodskee on December 15, 2023, 07:57:49 AM

Correct Roobet seems to lessen their way of advertising here in Bitcointalk and not planning
to add more anytime in the future as even their Signature campaigns are now running with 10 members from 60 regular members

It's pretty common for most casino after some years of launching themselves here. If you remember the likes of Cloudbet, Bustadice,Bitsler etc, they used to have lots of promotions here back in the day but as time passed their activity reduced in the forum.
Now I am not saying every casino follows the same path but sometimes these things happen.

As for the Roobet Casino in particular, I believe that reducing the number of participants in the signature campaign is not evidence of a lack of casino activity, because that would have led to strengthening its advertising campaigns on the forum and not reducing them.

They still have multiple campaigns here in the forum, the signature and of course the art contest every Month. They reduced the number of participants for a purpose and they’ve been here in the market for years and maybe they already meet their target market and population, that’s while reducing the cost is also part of it so they can use the funds into other things. Marketing campaign is very important, and so far Roobet is practicing their best to maintain the quality.

I agree with you that managing signature campaigns in particular is very expensive, and Roobet in particular spends a huge budget every week for more than three years. This budget may have become expensive for Roobet, which forced it in the first stage to reduce the number of participants to only 30 members and then limit itself to only 10 members after that. Do not forget that the signature campaign requires participants to submit 15 minimum publications that require payment.

Maybe they are now a establish casino then want to test if their casino is sustainable even if they do minimal promotion and we see Roobet cuts a lot of that. But for sure there would be more from them in future since they don't want their casino to be out of the limelight and once they see that they needed to run a new promotion since there competitor is starting to get a lot of exposure then for sure that Roobet will compete again and launched a new offer that can attract us or maybe they increase back the number of their campaign participants to maximize back their presence here.

There is another point worth mentioning related to the number of signature campaigns for gambling sites that are active in parallel with the roobet campaign. These campaigns are competitive, and roobet was their leader par excellence by virtue of having the longest campaign duration and the most generous payout. And I think it still is. But there are also signature campaigns for the mixer that pay better than other types of campaigns, which forces casino signature campaigns to increase the number of participants and payments every week.

During this period, it was announced that any activities related to the mixing platforms, including signing campaigns, would be completely abandoned. This is good news for other signature campaigns, such as Roobet, which can now reduce the campaign’s weekly budget, including reducing the number of participants.