@JJG - you crack me up sometimes but, also amaze me at the amount of thought and analyzing you perform.
No problem... I cannot really help myself, anyhow, and as you might realize, I have been just chomping at the bit to revisit my HypoPhil model, while at the same time potentially adding to it by showing some buy back ideas.
Here's a couple of charts that summarizes the HypoPhil matter.
** Hey JJG.
I tried to reconstruct your spreadsheet and encountered some difficulties matching it.
HypoMyth's BTC sell ladder PlanIn particular I saw the raking formula (column D) is not accurate, and also it changes somehow on the hypothesis of the reinvestments...But it's not specified how.
Upon receiving more direction, I can provide you with the usual spreadsheet to share.
Oh Thanks. You are right that I had a twist in my formula, and I had not remembered that I had put an additional 0.2% deduction in the amounts for the rakes and also into the reinvestment amounts in order to roughly account for exchange fees.. yet ultimately that part of the formula is likely not necessary in order to attempt to focus on the overall ideas rather than getting caught up in the weeds...so once i remove my the additional 0.2% from mine, then our base numbers match up.... even though I see that you had not yet placed the projected reinvestment success of 41.67% in your Column A numbers.
I'm wondering also if you want to keep all this in the WO or if you want to move it to your specific thread.
That is probably a good idea, because it does kind of relate to the sustainable withdrawal idea.. but more of a price-based angle, as compared to my motivation of that that other thread was a monthly withdrawal limit.. which kind of becomes a time-based system that also just withdraws every month but also takes into account of the location of the spot price in relation to the 200-week moving average.. whereas this one is more of a pure price based approach... maybe I can put this chart into that thread since it is kind of related, and maye it wouldn't confuse people too much if I provide a bit of a descriptor regarding how it relates and how it differs..