Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 03:26:31 PM

Quote from: ecdsa123 on December 23, 2023, 04:18:39 PM

No @BlackHatCoiner , i'm using translator from my born language:). - I Hope it is not Illegal on this forum?

It is not forbidden, but it seems like I'm chatting with GPT. (Also, don't bold entire sentences, it is not readable)

Quote from: Synchronice on Today at 12:36:32 PM

Reward halves, block size doubles. I think this would be a good solution! Was this even discussed before?

But reward doesn't halve. Subsidy does. There is no correlation between the block size and the subsidy. The reward decreases on the long term, but that's because of the mere assumption that the transaction fees will be less than the current subsidy. The current wave of Ordinal transactions shows that the network can pretty much survive by transaction fees alone, and we're years before it is adopted in a mass scale.

that is the good thing about this

year ——————-rewards————-——- fees
2009/2012 50 >>>>>>>>>> under 0.1
2012/2016. 25. under 0.05-0.1
2016/2020. 12.5. 0.1-2.0
2020/2024. 6.25. 0.2-5.0
2024/2028. 3.125. 1.0-6.0. seems possible

the major pools (foundry) are black box and not transparent.n you need 20ph+ to join them

foundry can down clock to crowd the mempool then over clock to grab extra higher fee blocks which they helped to create by down clocking.

in 2024 the reward penalty for a block lost due to downclocking becomes ½ so right now it costs 250k in rewards for blocks lost trying to clog the chain. april that cost drops to 125k a bargin

should be real interesting after this ½ ing.