Quote from: TryNinja on Today at 12:14:53 AM

Interessante.

Segui lendo o tópico. O Hal pergunta se o satoshi está endossando a ideia de blockchains com suas próprias altcoins. Cheesy

Quote from: Hal on December 10, 2010, 07:14:04 PM

Satoshi, are you endorsing the idea that additional block chains would each create their own flavor of coins, which would trade with bitcoins on exchanges? These chain-specific coins would be used to reward miners on those chains, and to purchase some kinds of rights or privileges within the domain of that chain?

O mesmo confirma:

Quote from: satoshi on December 10, 2010, 07:55:12 PM

Quote from: Hal on December 10, 2010, 07:14:04 PM

additional block chains would each create their own flavor of coins, which would trade with bitcoins on exchanges? These chain-specific coins would be used to reward miners on those chains, and to purchase some kinds of rights or privileges within the domain of that chain?

Right, the exchange rate between domains and bitcoins would float.

A longer interval than 10 minutes would be appropriate for BitDNS.

So far in this discussion there's already a lot of housekeeping data required. It will be much easier if you can freely use all the space you need without worrying about paying fees for expensive space in Bitcoin's chain. Some transactions:

Changing the IP record.

Name change. A domain object could entitle you to one domain, and you could change it at will to any name that isn't taken. This would encourage users to free up names they don't want anymore. Generated domains start out blank and the miner sells it to someone who changes it to what they want.

Renewal. Could be free, or maybe require consuming another domain object to renew. In that case, domain objects (domaincoins?) could represent the right to own a domain for a year. The spent fee goes to the miners in the next block fee.

"Domain objects" me passa a sensação dos NFTs. "The right to own a domain for a year"

Quem diria, não?

Considerando que o Satoshi foi o primeiro a deixar uma mensagem na blockchain, acho que faz sentido que ele seja a favor dos Ordinals.

Mas eu li as mensagens umas três vezes e não entendi quase nada kkkk

Quando ele diz ''The networks need to have separate fates.'' Fates aqui seriam blockchains separadas? Algo como um fork ou mais parecido com um layer 2? Eu entendo que ele diz que sim, deve existir uma rede focada em grandes dados, mas considerando as necessidades diferentes de cada função, precisa ser algo separado. Mas não entendo qual é a sugestão da separação. E pelo que entendo, essa separação não é uma separação em nível de poder computacional, já que tanto no caso do domains ou do bitcoin em si, eles citam os mineradores do bitcoin.

Alguém entendeu mais e consegue esclarecer?