Quote from: BossJumong on Today at 04:26:18 AM

Don't worry, even if you didn't mention Stakes' signature campaign participants, we all know that you're referring to this users.

This user's post also seems like an essay: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=885934

I don't want to mention names because there are many. Most of them are probably coming from stake campaign. It seems like some of them are trying to make a post longer when it can be done with short post.

Quote from: BossJumong on Today at 04:26:18 AM

Quote from: Apocollapse on Today at 03:41:54 AM

Because long post make your post looks high quality,

It doesn't mean a long post equals a high-quality post; most of this post is just to meet signature campaign quotas.

I think merit sources knows what post to be merited. They are aware if a user is just trying to fill the campaign requirement and trying to force a long post to impress their campaign manager. I hope campaign managers would also look on members that makes long post which arent' really necessary.

Quote from: mk4 on Today at 04:35:04 AM

Simply because a lot of users think that posting long topics makes it highly more likely for them to receive merits; even though if you read most of those, the thread seems to be pretty forced(character and word count wise). Not to mention that some are ChatGPT-generated.

If anything, it makes me far less likely to give merits. Just freakin get to the point without all the unnecessary fluff.

You are one of the most merited member in the forum and I like your post because it doesn't need to be too long, you'll only make it long when necessary and yet you can convey your thoughts effectively. I wish there are more people like you.

---

I have no grudge against members that do long post, but I am just disappointed on some who value their post based on quantity, not quality.